50% off Premium Yearly

TSE:CNR
This summary was created by AI, based on 35 opinions in the last 12 months.
Canadian National R.R. (CNR) has faced challenges including reduced guidance, strikes, and external issues affecting volumes, leading to a drop in stock valuation. Despite these obstacles, experts express optimism about its long-term prospects, citing its substantial network, good free cash flow, and a history of share buybacks. Concerns over trade tariffs and economic cycles continue to loom, but many expect that once such uncertainties are resolved, CNR could benefit significantly. The company's competitive advantages, such as high barriers to entry and pricing power, make it a potentially attractive investment, especially as valuations have adjusted lower recently. Overall, while current conditions reflect some pessimism, the long-term outlook remains positive as CNR is anticipated to remain a vital player in the transportation sector.
Looks good fundamentally. Long-term chart shows an upward trend, and then it's gone sideways for the last couple of years. Average price of $156 for that sideways consolidation phase. These bigger, more predictable companies can go sideways for years. Not bad for dividends. For Canadian investors, almost a must-own stock.
Short-term trading range is about $148 to $174. We're closer to the lower level now. Not a bad time to buy. Expectations should be tempered to 10%, or $15, over the next year.
Wildfires and labour disruptions hurt volumes. Recent quarterly results show that's improved. Guidance cut. Part of an oligopoly. More economical than trucking. Rails will be a solid part of the economy forever. Compelling valuation, good chance to step in. Yield is 2.2%.
Goods consumption has slowed as consumer spending has slowed. Question marks about tariffs and importing goods. If the US administration gets tougher on tariffs from Mexico (where CNR isn't as active as CP), that could benefit CNR as we see more goods come through Canada.
Has fallen alot because of the sense that the economy is weakening, but rails have pricing power. Are higher operational expenses due to issues in Vancouver and are labour negotations. He sees these as short-term headwinds. Rails are a great, environmentally friendly business. There are only 5 major rail companies in North America, which is another plus.
Recession-resistant business model. More conservative earnings growth outlook. Great long-term investment. Recent 10% price drop is a great time to average down or get in. Lagged peers in performance, but still strong free cashflow and better operating margins. Yield is 2.2%.
Last year, earnings increased 15% YOY despite revenue slump and economic uncertainty. Pullback is an opportunity. If all goes well, should see 10-15% EPS growth through to 2026. Ranks 9/10, with 16% price appreciation to $180.
Great business, likes rails. More environmentally friendly than trucking. Almost an oligopoly, can't build more rails. Falling because of a difficult commodity cycle, plus it's a cyclical in the face of slower economic growth. Worth buying at these levels. Executes well. Price competition with competitors no longer as cutthroat.
CNR is now trading at 19X Forward P/E. In the 2Q, CNR’s revenue grew 7% to $4.33B, slightly missing the estimates of $4.38B and EPS of $1.84 missed estimates of $1.93. The operating results slightly missed expectations. The balance sheet has an OK net debt/EBITDA of 2.5x. The company continues to repurchase shares aggressively and pay healthy dividends. Overall, results missed expectations but management is still expected to compound diluted EPS in the range of 10%-15% over the 2024-2026 period along with a healthy ROIC. We think CNR’s long-term fundamentals remain intact.
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free
In the spotlight recently because trade wars and tariffs could impact the volumes being taken to the US by quite a bit. ROE tends to be more profitable than CP, but you're paying close to twice the price-to-book. Prefers CP, as its merger with Kansas City has opened up a whole new area.
He'd be looking south of the border instead.