50% off Premium Yearly

TSE:T
This summary was created by AI, based on 84 opinions in the last 12 months.
Telus Corp (T-T) faces significant scrutiny from analysts following a recent 55% cut in its dividend, which, while easing immediate concerns, leads to questions about long-term sustainability. Experts highlight the company’s challenges, particularly its high payout ratio and the competition in the Canadian telecom industry. While some view Telus as a stable income provider, the lack of organic growth and potential for further dividend cuts weigh heavily on sentiment. The transition to a new CEO raises hopes for restructuring and asset sales, but many analysts suggest caution due to the broader economic pressures affecting the telecom sector. Overall, while Telus holds value for income-focused investors, concerns about revenue stagnation and high debt persist, leading to a complex outlook for the company.
Feels the current management team have done a wonderful job. They have transformed it into the kind of story that he really likes, focusing on their use of capital and the generation of cash. They are looking at consistently trying to drive their cash flow growth at 10% a year and returning capital aggressively to shareholders. Among the majors in Canada, this would be his favourite. On a near-term basis, the entire group are facing the headline risk of what is going to happen with a 4th operator in the country.
Versus its peers, he really likes it. They have the best penetration on wireless and some of the better profit metrics. The group is struggling a little bit and have a few headwinds in their face on an inventory basis. However, he feels that a lot of that is starting to get factored into the stock. He hasn’t owned much telecom in the past year or so. Maybe it’s getting to the point where everybody recognizes that wireless is slowing down and there could be a 4th player out there, but in the end these are great cash generating businesses.
He doesn’t have too much of a position in telecommunications. Going from the 3-year to the 2-year contracts has made it more expensive, and he thinks people are holding on to their phones a little longer. Also, when they do issue new phones, they now have to amortize them over a shorter period of time to recoup their costs. Revenues per person are being squeezed a little. Very competitive market. With the government wanting a 4th national competitor, that could really affect the market to some extent too. Too many uncertainties.