Summer Sale
50% off Premium Yearly
NASDAQ:NFLX
Netflix Inc. (NFLX)
Financials 
Technical Analysis 
Jun 11, 2026, 12:00 amThis summary was created by AI, based on 71 opinions in the last 12 months.
Experts have mixed views on Netflix Inc. (NFLX), recognizing its strong position as a global leader in streaming, bolstered by significant investments in original content and live events. While some analysts highlight the company's pricing power and solid customer retention, there are concerns about competition and potential limits to future growth, especially with changing content consumption trends. The recent decision to back out of the Warner Bros. Discovery acquisition has led to a positive uptick in share prices, as it alleviated fears around balancing the company's finances amid substantial debt. Predictions for earnings growth range from 20% to 25%, but there's caution about elevated valuation metrics that suggest the stock may be trading at a rich multiple. As the company continues to explore avenues for revenue growth, including advertising and new content strategies, opinions vary on whether now is the time to buy, hold, or sell based on individual investment strategies and market conditions.
NFLX vs. DIS Two completely different companies in the same business. Netflix is the grand daddy of streaming. Success built on increasing subscriber base. Under the hood, it's cashflow negative. Accounting tricks let them amortize earnings. Disney is an established behemoth, getting into streaming. They own parks and ESPN, and have substance to support streaming investment.
Michael Decter
Shane Obata62 million subs in US and 69 million worldwide. For five years it didn't have competition, and that competition has a body of existing content to stream (Disney+ and others). Compared that to Netflix, it needs to spend a lot on content. Yet, it isn't generating the cash flow to offset that cost. The question is: How many streamers will consumers subscribe to?
Chart went down, came back, now is quite flat. Lots of competition ahead from Disney. Kind of expensive. Higher beta. Growth rate susceptible to something going wrong. FANGs have been underperforming the broader market in the last 12 months. Will have to spend a lot to develop original content.
An amazing company and who is cutting their subscriptions? No one he knews. If you buy this, then you assume they will continue to raise rates and slow spending. He doesn't know that for sure and so he owns Disney instead.
Disney vs. Netflix over 10 years He owns both, but Netflix will see more grwoth as it penetrates internationally and doubling worldwide subscribers. They could expand into music and games. Disney pays a dividend, but Netflix will give you a higher total return. With Disney, be patient as they get into streaming, especially internationally.
Robert LauzonA growth stock with 30% growth rates in the short term, especially internationally. The second half of this year will see great new content, like the new Scorsese film, The Irishman. This will drive viewership. Netflix changes the way we watch TV. Also, they haven't pulled the lever on adding ads (say, at a lower-tier subscription fee). There's room for both Disney+ and Netflix, based on consumer research he's seen. (Analysts’ price target is $395.65)
Robert Lauzon
Don Lato'%20fill='%23ffffff'%3e%3cg%20id='Pager'%20transform='translate(423.000000,%201755.000000)'%3e%3cpath%20d='M243.295367,17.286474%20C243.68919,16.9045087%20244.327703,16.9045087%20244.721525,17.286474%20L249,21.4361302%20L253.278475,17.286474%20C253.672297,16.9045087%20254.31081,16.9045087%20254.704633,17.286474%20C255.098456,17.6684393%20255.098456,18.2877274%20254.704633,18.6696927%20L249.35654,23.856763%20C249.159628,24.0477457%20248.840372,24.0477457%20248.64346,23.856763%20L243.295367,18.6696927%20C242.901544,18.2877274%20242.901544,17.6684393%20243.295367,17.286474%20Z'%20id='Path'%20transform='translate(249.000000,%2020.500000)%20scale(-1,%201)%20rotate(-90.000000)%20translate(-249.000000,%20-20.500000)%20'%3e%3c/path%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)
'%20fill='%23ffffff'%3e%3cg%20id='Pager'%20transform='translate(423.000000,%201755.000000)'%3e%3cpath%20d='M243.295367,17.286474%20C243.68919,16.9045087%20244.327703,16.9045087%20244.721525,17.286474%20L249,21.4361302%20L253.278475,17.286474%20C253.672297,16.9045087%20254.31081,16.9045087%20254.704633,17.286474%20C255.098456,17.6684393%20255.098456,18.2877274%20254.704633,18.6696927%20L249.35654,23.856763%20C249.159628,24.0477457%20248.840372,24.0477457%20248.64346,23.856763%20L243.295367,18.6696927%20C242.901544,18.2877274%20242.901544,17.6684393%20243.295367,17.286474%20Z'%20id='Path'%20transform='translate(249.000000,%2020.500000)%20rotate(-90.000000)%20translate(-249.000000,%20-20.500000)%20'%3e%3c/path%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)
Facing competition from Disney, Amazon, Google, and Apple. Expensive. Is the 40% growth rate sustainable? Cash burn. Stock's gone sideways. Technically weak. Underperformed since 2018 with the other FANGs.