
TSE:BDT
This summary was created by AI, based on 16 opinions in the last 12 months.
Bird Construction (BDT-T) has garnered a mix of bullish and cautious sentiments from various experts. Many highlight the company's significant backlog and exposure to growth areas like AI data centers, renewables, and infrastructure projects, anticipating that these factors will drive margin expansion and profitability. However, concerns about the construction sector's inherent volatility, thinner margins, and the risks associated with fixed-price contracts temper some of the enthusiasm. Analysts emphasize the importance of keeping an eye on the valuation, with some suggesting that the stock appears to be overbought, while others see it as a solid long-term hold with strong revenue visibility, especially under new government infrastructure spending plans. In light of recent performance, some experts advise waiting for a pullback to capitalize on a better entry point.
(Note the short timeframe.) Very bullish. Just because it's up 100%, doesn't mean it's time to sell. Exceptional backlog growth, margin expansion. Guidance is actually very conservative. Huge opportunity for data centres. Participating in Ring of Fire, which he's bullish on. More room to run over next several years.
On fire. A bit technically overbought. The $11B backlog is great. Data centre contract with BCE. Multiple's not expensive at 16x 2027 PE for 30% growth. Trades at a higher multiple than WSP and ATRL, as it's riskier. Try to get it cheaper.
Sentiment is the reverse for WSP and ATRL. Fears of AI disruption curtailing growth. Both look meritorious at these levels. He models 17% growth for ATRL at 14x PE. WSP models 17% growth at 12.5x PE. These 2 are more of a Buy, wouldn't sell.
Federal government and infrastructure are the keys here. Small cap, not a lot of eyeballs on it. He likes to get in early. It can grow on its own merits and organically to become a large-cap stock.
Over 75% of combined backlog is in a collaborative model. Moved from cyclical contractor to a more diversified infrastructure platform. Recently announced combined backlog of $10B -- multi-year revenue visibility. Should see steadier revenue and profitability growth. Up this year, but long road to go.
Pays dividend monthly. If FCF grows as he expects, dividend should grow. Yield is 1.87%.
No qualms about buying. General contractor that builds industrial buildings and infrastructure. Energy, defense, trade/transport, healthcare, nuclear. Good grower and compounder, growing dividend at a 10% compound pace over last 8 years. Trades at 15x PE, all-time highs. Strong chart with higher highs/lows. Market cap is fairly small at $2.3B. Yield is ~2%.
Some pretty high-profile contracts in its backlog or underway. Examples include Peel Memorial Hospital in the GTA, BHP Jansen potash mine, Bruce Power nuclear.
He has a better idea, though it's not a perfect substitute for this name. See his Top Picks.
Directly exposed to the Build Canada theme. 100% of its business is in Canada. Massive pickup in its backlog, and that backlog is coming in at much higher margins than the current business. Highly visible, high predictable. Expects margin expansion, high profitability, and free cashflow generation.
Extremely cheap. High-quality business, so even multiple expansion is possible. Whether a company has enough resources to meet the backlog is a good question, and this company has a good track record of doing so. Reputation is on the line if it doesn't deliver. Yield is 2.85%.
One issue is that every once in a while they take a fixed-price contract and lose $$ on it. A risk that keeps the valuation low. Sector should have some growth with planned infrastructure spending. Needs a bit more consistency in execution and meeting estimates.
It's just OK. He prefers the larger companies like WSP and STN in terms of safety, especially as we don't know which way the economy's going to go in the next couple of years. BDT is relatively small, so investors would be quick to sell if things get dicey.
EPS of $0.50 slightly missed estimates of $0.504 and sales of $850.77M missed estimates of $946.31M. The quarter was impacted by temporary project delays as its clients adapted to rapidly chaning market conditions. Its next quarter is expected to be impacted by similar delays, and this caused some analyst price target cuts, which led to its price decline. Sales and earnings declined year-over-year, and while its gross margins expanded, it was not enough to offset the decline in sales. It has had a strong run since 2023, but with a slowdown in future growth expectations, we think investors will need to be patient on this one. It is priced decently at 10X forward earnings and 0.4X forward sales, but investors will likely want to see growth expectations resume their upward trend before the stock can see positive momentum again.
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free
Bird Construction is a Canadian stock, trading under the symbol BDT.TO (previously BDT-T on Stockchase) on the Toronto Stock Exchange (BDT-CT). It is usually referred to as TSX:BDT or BDT.TO
In the last year, 13 stock analysts issued a Buy, Sell, or Hold rating on BDT.TO (previously BDT-T on Stockchase). 9 analysts recommended to BUY and 1 analyst recommended to SELL the stock. The latest stock analyst rating is RISKY. Read the latest stock experts' ratings for Bird Construction.
Bird Construction was recommended as a Top Pick by Andrew Pink on 2026-07-24. Read the latest stock experts ratings for Bird Construction.
Earnings reports or recent company news can cause the stock price to drop. Read stock experts' recommendations for Bird Construction.
Bird Construction is followed by 208 investors on Stockchase and is a trending stock that is worth watching.
On 2026-07-29, Bird Construction (BDT.TO) stock closed at a price of $63.86.
Margins are thinner in construction companies, so he typically doesn't buy in. With thinner margins, or cost overruns, easy to miss on a quarter. Great spot right now, stock's doing extremely well. Company's bigger than it was. Scrutinize the valuation. In the sector, hard assets seem to be a better bet than software-related services.