50% off Premium Yearly

Head of Research at 5i Research
Member since: Apr '26 · 27 Opinions
Seeing a lot of fluctuations. What's really telling about markets right now is this stairstep pattern that's emerging.
We'll see a bad market headline, or something relating to Iran/US, and the market sells off while oil spikes. Eventually we get a piece of good news, and that sends the market higher. Each time that happens, the market move higher is a bit more resilient and the following pullback is a bit more shallow. That tells him that the market's climbing this wall of worry.
Last week on the ceasefire agreement news, we saw oil drop 10-15% on the day. We don't need to see the Strait opened, or a definitive agreement between the US and Iran. We can have some starts and stops. The market's pricing in an eventual resolution.
Markets really move on the rate of change, and that's what we're seeing here.
He really looks at the VIX as the arbiter of truth. When it spikes above 30 (as it did 2 weeks ago), that's when he looks to allocate to growth stocks. They were likely hit hardest into that drawdown, and they'll likely perform the best in a bounce back.
When the VIX is between 20-30, investors would do well position defensively. It's a time of market indecisiveness, with forward returns being quite weak. You're looking at HALO names, energy, and consumer staples.
With the VIX below 20, investors can position between growth and defensive names (with a slight tilt towards growth). Returns from this point tend to do quite well, though not as well as when the VIX is above 30.
Definitely thinks this is a long-term story. We have a lot of supply constraints, and the growth story is still very much intact.
The data centre buildout has a lot of parallels to the railroad buildout of 100 years ago. Of course, there will be some mini-booms and busts throughout the cycle.
Safe stock: generally pays a lower yield, has a cheap/modest valuation, lower levels of volatility.
Volatile stock: associated with a compounder, traditionally pay low/no dividend yield, high volatility, premium valuation.
The key factor is that many investors equate volatility with risk. But really, volatility can just be the engine of compounding. Some of the best-performing stocks over the last decade have all had a 50% drawdown at some point. That’s not always a reason to sell.
He did an analysis across 1000+ stocks. Stocks that have compounded the best over the last decade look nothing like what most investors are comfortable buying. Most want a good dividend yield, low volatility, cheap valuation. Actually, some of the best-performing names have high valuation, lots of volatility, and low/no yield. These names typically take FCF and reinvest it back into the business for future growth. Nascent companies often have lumpy earnings, but the long-term trajectory is intact.