50% off Premium Yearly

NASDAQ:AAPL
This summary was created by AI, based on 85 opinions in the last 12 months.
Experts provide a mixed view of Apple Inc (AAPL) amidst concerns regarding its position in the AI landscape and the pressures on margins due to rising costs, especially in chip manufacturing. Many emphasize the company's strong fundamentals, characterized by substantial free cash flow and an enormous share buyback program, while noting that valuations seem high at around 33-38x PE. The consensus suggests that Apple is adjusting cautiously to avoid excessive capital expenditure on AI, instead leveraging existing partnerships with companies like Google. Despite recent softness in revenue and market performance, particularly in the smartphone segment, Apple's loyal consumer base and expanding service offerings provide a robust outlook, indicated by steady over the past year. However, the lack of innovation and reaction to rising manufacturing costs raises questions about future growth potential, with some experts advising caution on current pricing levels and advocating for profit-taking.
This just hit an all-time high. Technically, you have to love this. Strong upward trend and outperforming the market. On a seasonal basis, it tends to move higher this time of year in anticipation of the September launches they always have. However, it does take a pause in May, June and early July. It doesn’t go down, it just kind of sits there for a while.
An inexpensive technology stock. Wishes they would pay more of a dividend, simply because they have so much cash. The trouble is, a lot of earnings come from one product. That product can continue to grow, and is a very high margin product for them. Their service area is growing as well. Have a lot of cash, and they buy back a lot of shares. There is a good upgrade cycle on the phone. Their services business is additive, but not great. If they were allowed to bring their overseas cash back to the US, that would substantially help them out because they could buy back more of their shares.
A myriad of multinational companies with off shore cash would be huge beneficiaries of the opportunity to repatriate cash. He does not view Apple as a tech company, but as a consumer discretionary company. This is one of highest weights on the NASDAQ. There is probably room for continued dividend growth. It would be a beneficiary of more relaxed regulatory action in the US.
(A Top Pick Dec 23/16. Up 23%.) This has been a great buy. Has reduced his holdings, because the catalysts he was looking for hasn’t happened yet. Two of them were related tax reforms, particularly the possible repeat duration of offshore funds. He is also hearing of delays of iPhone 8. He still likes this. Still at a reasonable valuation.
(A Top Pick May 3/16. Up 52%.) Feels the upgrade cycle is going to be a big cycle. They are building their service business really well. Trading at reasonable valuations. It is a big, big weight in the index, and there is a lot of money going into index funds, which is a positive. A very, very innovative company.
This has been in the middle of a great run. The tendency is for this to run up into a large product cycle, which is coming via the new iPhone. In the short term, it is probably a little overbought. He likes the Tech space as a whole. This company continues to dominate with its products. Would prefer to see it pull back to their moving average of $132-$135.
Apple (AAPL-Q) or Alphabet (GOOGL-Q)? He owns both, and both are great holdings. The amazing thing about this one is that they have about 1 billion basically captive users of their products. What makes that even more impressive is that there is a 93% loyalty rate. They produce a ton of cash. A 3rd of their market cap is in cash. Trading well below the market multiple. A great core holding for any portfolio.
Although the stock has gone up considerably over 3-4 years, it is still not expensive, because the earnings growth has been there. Where can you buy a company that is trading at 15-16 times with the amount of cash on hand and this kind of a balance sheet. Dividend yield of 1.6%. (Analysts’ price target is $145.)
Companies go through cycles, and this one is on the downside of a cycle. ROC peaked in 2012, and ROC has been going down since that time. It is still at 15%, which is very respectable. Many companies would kill to have a 15% ROC. Valuation is OK, but doesn’t jump out as being super cheap. There are alternatives that you should be in. He would prefer something like Microsoft (MSFT-Q), Amazon (AMZN-Q), Facebook (FB-Q) or Google (GOOGL-Q). You aren’t going to get killed in this, but when there are alternatives that look so much more exciting, he would go with those.