
NYSE:PFE
This summary was created by AI, based on 31 opinions in the last 12 months.
Pfizer Inc. (PFE) is currently facing significant challenges, primarily due to a patent cliff and a lack of earnings momentum following the COVID-19 pandemic. Many experts express concerns over its drug pipeline, indicating that the company is in need of a blockbuster drug to drive future growth. While it maintains an attractive dividend yield—ranging from 6.4% to 7%—there is skepticism about the sustainability of this yield if new profitable drugs are not developed soon. The stock’s valuation is seen as low, trading at around 8-10 times earnings, which some experts believe might make it appealing for patient investors. However, the consensus also points to caution due to the industry-wide challenges, including cost-cutting measures and potential government pressure on drug pricing.
Pharmaceutical stocks in general have not being great performers because of worries about drug pricing and patent cliffs. This is a company that has faced patent cliffs in the past and currently. The way the industry normally responds to this is by developing new drugs themselves to replace what they are losing, or making acquisitions of companies that have promising drugs. Dividend yield of 3.9%. (Analysts’ price target is $37.)
Yield is about 4% and the stock is selling at about $33, so he sees a skinny into the low $40’s. They’ve struggled for the last 2 years because blockbuster drugs have come off patent, but they are using financial engineering to continue to push the company forward. Have made several acquisitions of new and upcoming companies with some very interesting drugs. A very low risk way of playing the healthcare industry. There is more upside than downside.
Likes the valuation. Trading at around 13X next year’s earnings. This has a history from 2010 to 2015, subject to a big patent cliff, where they had significant declines in revenues. They’ve filled out their pipeline. Has 140 drugs that are over $100 million in revenues. 8 are blockbusters with over $1 billion in revenues. Likes the valuation and the yield.
He is bullish on this. It is all about risk/reward. The company has an infrastructure, in terms of its sales force, that is unmatched. They have a very pristine balance sheet. Wonderful research and development operations. Very attractive dividend at close to 4%. It will likely outperform the Dow over the next 12-18 months.
You have to be careful of healthcare names. It looks like Trump has a bit of a target on these. Even without Trump, this company has an underwhelming pipeline of drugs that are coming through, and that is the issue that is hitting them. Trading at about 13X earnings, but its growth rate has come down to very, very low single digits. An unexciting drug pipeline is probably going to hold it back.
This had a patent cliff with Wyatt a couple of years ago, which had a lot of promising new drugs. They have a huge amount of assets overseas in cash, which they would love to bring back, but taxation rates to bring that back are very, very high. Under the Trump administration, it is expected that that is going to change and the tax rate is going to plummet, making a lot of sense for US drug companies to bring money back in, which they can use for share buybacks, acquisitions or pumping up R&D. Dividend yield of 3.96%. (Analysts’ price target is $37.42.)
Pfizer (PFE-N) or Merck (MRK-N)? Neither. These companies did very, very well back in the last part of the last century. Patent protection laws really haven’t given them enough of a boost to be able to cover the enormous costs of developing and testing the drugs, and there is a high failure rate. The companies have made massive consolidations. They’ve tried to grow by spending less. He would look at the Bio-Pharma area instead, such as Biogen (BIIB-Q) or Celgene (CELG-Q). Financially, these companies are in good shape and are growing.