
NYSE:TMO
This summary was created by AI, based on 16 opinions in the last 12 months.
Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) is viewed positively by various experts who highlight its strong market position and high-quality offerings in the life sciences sector. It is considered a leader that supplies essential products to the healthcare industry, which is expected to continue growing. Despite the recent challenges in healthcare funding and economic factors affecting the sector, analysts point to improving demand for TMO's services, particularly in biopharma and research labs. The company has a favorable backlog and is leveraging partnerships, such as with openAI, to enhance innovation. While TMO's valuation presents a mix of views—some see it as slightly overvalued, others see fair value—there's a general consensus on its resilience and long-term potential.
Challenging year or two. Did well during Covid, then had to normalize. Then rising interest rates impacted spending in biotech. Chinese market's been very soft. Not growing at historical pace, but this should normalize. New US administration's focus on healthcare costs may impact some of TMO's clients.
In the end, one of the leaders in the space. Diverse and extensive international client base. Over the long term, healthcare is a very attractive industry to be in, mainly due to demographics. Attractive multiple.
Not inclined to buy at this time. Chart shows the stock's not trading well. Covid was rocket fuel, but earnings have been flat to slightly down since then. Lots of White House noise about cutting funding for scientific research. Domiciled in US, but 50% of business is global export sales; EU escalated again today, there will be retaliatory tariffs.
2023 and 2024 were challenged due to overhang with inventory. Will benefit from talk of deregulation of healthcare in the US. In spite of flat pricing for products, dividends still grow between 11-20%. Defensive, high-quality name, sleep at night, just let it ride. Yield is 0.3%.
(Analysts’ price target is $643.86)Has longed liked this and it's long been a good performer, but it has struggled since peaking in end-2021 and pulled back in 2022, and sideways ever since. TMO benefitted in 2020-1 as drug companies spent a fortune dealing with Covid and needed TMO's medical machines. From Oct. 2023 to Sept. 2024, shares rose 51%, but is down 18% since then. But they last reported a mixed quarter: a slight miss in revenue though a slight beat in earnings and soft guidance. It sold off and hasn't stopped, though announcing a $4 billion share buyback last month helped. He expects a graudal improvement as business picks up int he next two years. Trades at only 22x PE 2025 vs. 30x historically, so it's cheap now.
The merger doesn't take effect until Jan. 1; she see few changes after the merger. Price has disappointed post-Covid, given inventory and interest rate hurdles. With rates falling, she expected health care to resume, but she thinks that spend is delayed. The stimulus in China will help. With the new US president, we also don't know what will happen to this sector. But she likes TMO's fundamentals, and would buy at these levels.
Touches all aspects of bio-pharma industry. For example, helps run pharmaceutical trials, and helps build and design new drugs. Everything you need, such as electron microscopes, to create new drugs and products.
Weak coming out of Covid, as there was too much inventory in the system. Now primed to see revenue growth reaccelerate. Last time, Trump was favourable to healthcare and biotech. Low multiple relative to its historical average. Yield is 0.3%.
All the tools and services that the healthcare industry needs, so you get diversity with just the one stock. Very well managed. Long-term growth targets are 7-9%. Always improves margins. China is about 8% of revenues, a bit weaker. Biotech funding dried up with higher rates. Inventory destocking. Hopefully, those 3 factors are behind them.
Another long-term holding. Reported today and is rallying over 12%. Has fantastic managers and businesses. However, cuts at the NIH and at universities makes TMO too ambiguous, too much political uncertainty. Won't add, but happy to hold.