
NASDAQ:NVDA
This summary was created by AI, based on 118 opinions in the last 12 months.
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is currently viewed as a dominant player in the AI and semiconductor space. Experts highlight the company's significant earnings growth, driven by rising demand for AI infrastructure and its advanced technologies like the Blackwell chips. However, concerns about potential competition and market saturation persist, with some analysts cautioning that high expectations might lead to disappointing results if the company fails to meet them. Overall, NVDA's stock is considered appealing but comes with risks associated with valuation and cyclical industry dynamics. Most analysts agree that NVDA has strong fundamentals, despite the potential for volatility and competition threatening its margins in the near future.
Bit of risk-off has come into markets in the last week or two. Mixed news. Good news today on GOOG, where BRK took a position. Yet on the other side, some prominent hedge funds have sold or sold short positions in the AI space. NVDA, for example, was divested from a very important hedge fund run by Peter Thiel. If Peter Thiel is selling NVDA, you have to sit up and take notice.
If you don't own it, buy here. A must-own. Pretty well sold out all the way until 2027. Some competition from the likes of AVGO and AMD, but it's still the leader. There will be a time (perhaps later in 2026 or in 2027) when growth rates will start to move down from 30% annual growth and closer to 20%. That's the time he thinks the engines will be the next big play.
His team always pays attention to the analysts' price targets, and it always becomes a bit self-fulfilling. Over the last year or two, there have been levels of resistance that now become levels of support. There's very heavy support ~$175-180 and again around $140-145. Valuations are stretched, and his team keeps in mind certain mental (not hard-wired) trailing stops so they can re-evaluate.
Bury is a great investor. Palantir is a more speculative business model with a strong retail investor following. In contrast, Nvidia is about the picks and shovels of the AI revolution. He isn't surprised Bury is betting against both, though. The demand Nvidia is seeing is supported by fundamentals. Companies are investing in AI and data centres, because they see strong demand for AI to be used in their businesses. Nvidia has done a great job of positioning themselves to take full advantage of what is happening today.
Not at all. There are too many people calling for a bubble. You don't have a bubble top when so many people are prognosticating that we might have a bubble. That's one sign.
The other sign is that if you look at forward earnings, it may be 26, 27, or maybe 30x forward PE. COST and WMT are trading at 50x. So that's not really a bubble. The darling of 2000, CSCO, was trading at 126x sales. That's a bubble.
He can see a bubble at some point in the future, and it's likely as this name continues skyward. But at the moment, it's fundamentally viable and driven by the demand for compute. The demand is actually there. Their chips are needed for AI, and the only reason we can't run AI at its full capabilities is because we can't get the energy to do so yet.
They just announced a monster revenue beat, an earnings beat, and their AI business beat revenue estimates