
NASDAQ:NFLX
Trading at 130X forward PE, a very high ratio. It has a great long-term growth rate of 35% for earnings. It is difficult for him to consider this name for a value or GARP name. However, global subscribers are growing, and he expects them to reach 99 million by the end of Q1. However, costs are swelling, because they continually need to increase their original content. There is also competition.
This is pricey in terms of a PE multiple, trading at nearly 300X on a forward earnings basis. However, they’ve got great growth and exciting things are happening with them. Doing very well going to the international market, not so much in China. They are going to reach about 92 million subscribers internationally. Their costs are swelling, because they have to get a lot of original content, which is going to be a headwind for them. He views this as more of a trading stock than anything.
Since the early part of this year, this has stayed in a very, very narrow range bound type of market. Its current range seems to be $80-$85-$100. Subscriber growth is getting to be a little less than what was expected. A lot of the grandfathering that went on with pricing, is now being un-grandfathered. There is a lot of competition in the streaming area. Trading at a pretty high valuation, and you have to be careful of paying these types of multiples for a company like this. On a forward PE basis, you are paying 200X earnings. Growth is expected to be 33%, and what if the competition heats up a bit more.
Just bought some today. Expectations had been and are high. The street was looking for $2.1 billion in revenue, and it only delivered $1.5 billion, but the earnings was a beat. They expect to put on 300,000 subscribers in the next quarter. There are lots of reasons for the drop of 13% and it was warranted. However, they do have about 600 hours of original programming scheduled in the next 6 months.
This was one of the driving forces behind the upgrade in content on TV and they did really well. From his perspective, it looks good. Trading strongly and has come off the bottom. Because the stock had such a huge run last year, it probably needs some time to work that off, and might become investable again. If you are nervous, this is the kind of name that you could trim back for now, and then on a break out go back in.
Trades at an amazingly large valuation. It went to crazy astronomical valuations based on growth. They pursued international expansion and have grown subscribers that way as well. To remain competitive, they’ve had to invest in content, which is exceptionally difficult, so it becomes no different than a movie company, a risky proposition. They say they are making money, but what they don’t tell you is that they invest a huge amount of money, capitalize a bunch of expenses, and slowly write off those costs against some accountant’s view of how long they are going to be able to earn a revenue stream off that.
Loves the product, but not the stock. Have a great subscriber based business model, and always have the potential for price increases, but there is a lot of competition, particularly for content. Trading at 90 to 100 times earnings, and it takes a lot of earnings growth to keep the stock at this multiple, which is just not going to happen.
A very high growth momentum stock. This is down because they just reported and their international subscriber growth was below expectations. There is not a lot of fundamental core earnings valuation support. She is more of a value investor, so not the kind of stock she would buy. These types of names tend to be driven by technicals. If it reaches its 50 day moving average, maybe you step in there and then buy some more.