
TSE:MFC
This summary was created by AI, based on 27 opinions in the last 12 months.
Manulife Financial (MFC) is viewed positively by numerous analysts, with many highlighting its robust growth potential, especially in the Asian market and wealth management. The company has successfully increased its dividend yield, currently sitting at approximately 4-5%, while its price-to-earnings (PE) ratio remains attractive compared to peers in the banking sector. Analysts have noted concerns over potential earnings drops but maintain a long-term positive outlook, suggesting that MFC is suitable for income-focused investors. While many emphasize the reliability of MFC's dividend and its strong position in life insurance, there are mixed feelings regarding its growth prospects compared to other financial institutions. Overall, the sentiment leans towards MFC being a solid choice for those seeking steady income and moderate growth, but some experts advise caution regarding market volatility.
Share price performance has been disappointing. Had some headwinds in their investment portfolios through their energy exposure. She likes their position in Asia which gives him about 32% of their revenue. It is trading at 1X Price to BV. Longer-term this will have a higher core earnings growth profile. Dividend yield of about 4%.
This has very strong seasonality. Normally from around the end of January to the end of May the stock has gone up. Recently the stock has been going sideways, and slightly underperforming the market. We are getting close to the end of May and the technicals are starting to roll over a little. There are better opportunities to invest in other than this one. You want to sell into strength in the next couple of weeks.
A little cheaper than Sun Life (SLF-T). The whole industry requires higher interest rates to get moving. They delivered a bit of a surprise over the last 6 months in that they have investments in energy, and the stock pulled back. If you are a patient investor, you will do very well in both stocks. ROE is sub 10. Sun Life has a better ROE. They both have great Asian exposure which is doing well. Canadian banks will do better than either.
Sell or hold? This has been a tough one, and every quarter there are so many reasons that the shares should go up, and they just haven’t. They moved their business to becoming more focused on wealth management, which provides reoccurring revenues. Did a great acquisition of Standard Life and picked up instant clients that they could sell more cross products to. Also, have been able to penetrate in China where 30% of revenues come from now. Look at your portfolio and see what weighting you have in financials. If you are not overweight, that money would be better served in other financials such as Canadian banks.
This has become incredibly cheap at a 9.8 P/E ratio compared to a longer-term average of 10+. Lifecos need good stock markets to bring the value of their holdings up. They need higher returns from bonds. What they don’t need are bad experiences from oil/gas such as they’ve had. The business is growing like crazy in Asia and Canada, and to a lesser extent in the US.
This one has always had something come up and they stumble. He is warm toward the lifecos, especially as rates start to go up. He prefers SLF-T.
This has pulled back, a lot like US banks. Lifecos are all exposed to interest rates, and get squeezed when rates don’t go up. This has a lot of growth in Asia that is kind of non-interest rate exposed. They also have John Hancock in the US. He is showing 9X earnings and a discount to Book forward, which is as cheap as these things get. It will go back to $21-$22. Dividend yield of 4.03%.
This is going to be really dependent on where interest rates are moving. If they start moving higher, this stock should start moving higher. He prefers Sun Life (SLF-T) which has performed better and has a bit more diversification. However, this one is fine longer-term. Given that the 200 day moving average is falling, it is not a name he would own.