
TSE:MFC
This summary was created by AI, based on 27 opinions in the last 12 months.
Manulife Financial (MFC) has garnered mixed perspectives from various analysts, reflecting both its potential and current market position. While many experts acknowledge MFC's solid dividend yield and growth prospects, particularly in Asia, concerns about valuation and market conditions persist. The stock appears to be trading around 2x book value and has shown slow but steady growth, attracting attention from those looking for income rather than explosive growth. The consensus among experts is to proceed with caution and consider market pullbacks for optimal entry points, though some view the stock as a good long-term hold due to its stable dividend and cash flow. Overall, while there are positive signs, such as asset management improvements and capital growth, analysts advise careful monitoring given the mixed signals surrounding the broader financial sector's performance.
From a seasonal perspective, this tends to peak at around May, but the best month by far is February, which has an 81% frequency of success over the past 16 years. In April and May, the frequency falls to 50%. This stock had a huge decline today of 5.27%, breaking below its major moving averages. It looks like it is on track to test the February low of $15.32. There could be further downside. There is nothing to suggest that the selling is over.
You have seen Canadian banks go up, but Canadian insurers got left behind. Insurance companies try to fund liabilities through their assets, and in a low interest rate environment, where you have equity market volatility, it becomes much more difficult to do that. Ideally you want interest rates and equities to go up. He likes the insurance companies here, but thinks you are going to be restrained by the direction of interest rates.
It has been a tough place to make money. They did a good job of getting into Asia, who are getting older and wealthier quickly. There are lots of good things going on. He never bought it because he finds more attractive places to be in the space. It has been in the penalty box since they cut their dividend. There are better places for capital.
The last earnings report was quite a disappointment. He has been neutral to negative on this company for some time. They keep missing their objectives and did some write-downs. One concern is that a lot of their growth has come out of Asia, particularly China, and the situation there is a bit murky. Prefers Sun Life (SLF-T) or the banks. (See Top Picks.)
This is a tough call. If you are bent on owning an insurance company, this is probably one of the better ones. Have good assets, a good insurance book and good exposure to equity markets. They lowered their risk profile from 2008. Also, relatively cheap. The bigger concern is whether you should own an insurance company or not. They are heavily leveraged to the interest rate cycle, and every year we have said interest rates have got to go up, but instead they have come down. It’s a slow growth economy, so there is no need for higher interest rates. You are better off with Canadian banks which are cheaper.
Sun Life (SLF-T) or Manulife (MFC-T)? A hard choice. He owns Power Financial (POW-T) which owns Great West Life (GWO-T), because he likes the additional assets they have. There is a bit of a feeling that the insurers may be a better deal than banks with the banks having to shore up their loan loss provisions. Would probably rank this as a tie between the 2.
(A Top Pick April 14/15. Down 13.61%.) This has been very disappointing. Energy exposure in their portfolio has hurt them. Very attractively valued, trading below BV. Longer term she likes their exposure in Asia. Despite a disappointing 4th quarter in February, they raised their dividend by 9%.