
TSE:MFC
This summary was created by AI, based on 28 opinions in the last 12 months.
Manulife Financial (MFC) has garnered mixed reviews from experts, reflecting a range of perspectives on its current standing and future potential. Several analysts highlight the company's strong dividend yield and its robust performance in Asia, suggesting it may be a worthwhile long-term investment, particularly for those seeking income rather than growth. However, concerns regarding earnings fluctuations, market pullbacks, and comparisons with peers like Sun Life Financial indicate that MFC may not be as attractive as other options in the life insurance sector. Many experts recognize the potential for capital appreciation, yet they caution that the stock faces headwinds, especially when considering broader market dynamics and the performance of similar financial institutions. There is a prevailing sentiment that the stock remains a reliable choice, albeit needing careful monitoring amidst potential market corrections.
Safe dividends? In his opinion, financial dividends are all safe. Banks have never cut them ever, and he does not foresee this company cutting theirs. This is a stock that got pretty toppy at around $20. Had a great run to there, and now we are looking for levels of some sort that we could hold onto.
Whether looking at this, a US insurance company, US bank or Canadian bank, the financial sector has declined almost in lockstep with the decline of US 10 year bonds. That tells you that people are going to these things when they are more optimistic about rising rates. This company funds their liabilities through their assets, and their liabilities tend to go down when rates go up. Have hedged a lot of the interest rate exposure. The other concern is their Asian exposure. He would almost rather own a Canadian bank because their businesses are little more diverse insulating you from just one product line. Dividend yield of 3.9%.
Sun Life (SLF-T) or Manulife (MFC-T)? Both are great institutions. This one has a slightly bigger presence in Asia, which he likes, as it is a very immature market and will continue to grow. They each have good wealth management franchises. This one has had some redemptions on the institutional side, so there is a slight preference for this. Both are good companies and over time you will see dividend growth from both. Dividend yield of about 3.6%.
Good insurance operations in Canada and the US that throw off cash flow. They are fairly mature in the business, so it is what they do with that cash flow. It is going to expand their wealth management arm, a higher margin business, as well as investing in Asia. Asia is the biggest growth market for insurance companies. Insurance companies would benefit the most if interest rates went up.
A double from 2012. It came off about 20-25% recently. There is a concern on the asset side about investment of premiums and how much is invested in energy. The second biggest part of their growth was in Asia. Those are the headwinds. The stock eventually will price in the energy piece. He thinks this is starting to look a little more interesting.
Manulife (MFC-T) or Power Financial (PWF-T)? Power financial is more into Investors Group and Great West Life. Great West is basically health benefits and the demand is there, so it is inelastic. This company is in life insurance and other things that are little bit riskier. He prefers Chubb Ltd (CB-N).
Prefers Sun Life (SLF-T) because of the better dividend profile and being slightly more diversified. Interest rates have continued to move down, and insurers tend to move with interest rates as well as with equity markets. The dividend of 3.6% is safe. He is underweight most Canadian financials, including the insurers.
He looked at this in 2 areas. One is investments and the other is in their core business of selling insurance. They are having a tough time on the investment side, with corporate bond spreads widening out. This will have a short-term negative affect on insurance companies. However, their actual insurance business is quite strong. Their recent acquisition and exposure in China is quite positive. With the volatility here, there could be a better time to enter the insurance business.
In the doghouse having taken hits from the decline in energy prices, a lack of a rise in interest rates, as well as the volatility in equity markets. It would be nice for them if all 3 were improving, which he thinks they will. Wealth management and insurance are booming in both Canada and the far east. The US is more difficult, but they are working on that.