
TSE:CLS
This summary was created by AI, based on 33 opinions in the last 12 months.
Celestica Inc (CLS-T) has experienced significant momentum in the last few years, primarily attributed to its role in the data center buildout and increased demand driven by AI technologies. The stock has shown impressive growth of over 1,000% in three years, yet it currently trades at high price-to-earnings (PE) multiples, around 35-44x, resulting in high expectations from the market. Experts have expressed caution, suggesting that while the company has positive revenue growth and strong operational performance, its valuation may be stretched given the cyclical nature of its business and dependencies on hyperscaler revenues. Analysts recommend careful buying strategies, indicating that potential price corrections could create advantageous entry points, yet many foresee the risks associated with future AI spending and market volatility. Overall, the sentiment is mixed with some experts advising to take profits and others suggesting a long-term perspective with the caveat of high valuations.
12-month price target of $79, still a bit of room. On the chart, you can see the highs that go back to the early summer. Buy 1/3 here around $68, another at just under $64 where there seems to be some support, and the final 1/3 at just over $60. Put in a stop around $54-55.
Concentration risk, but its manufacturing and platform solutions are state of the art. Client base includes hyperscalers and service providers. Extremely well run.
Pulled back in July, rallied to a lower high, now has pulled back to just above the rising 200-day MA. Price pattern is a lot like big tech. Hold, but don't add. If you own it, use the 200-day as a line in the sand. Watch those lows from July. Be cautious. If it breaks $60, need to have a hard discussion.
With this type of stock, he asks himself whether it's just not better to own NVDA? CLS is benefiting today from data centre buildout and relationship with GOOG (an open secret). Those dynamics don't make them the best position in the value chain relative to NVDA and other players.
It's the end of the bullwhip effect. NVDA is the real, bleeding-edge innovator in the ecosystem. Sell CLS, and roll the gains into NVDA.
The chart is going straight up. They're moving from contract producers of electronics for others to consulting and apps. Earnings forecast is rising. The question is how long this will go. The last time the chart did this was in 2000. If it returns to its 2000 level, shares could double. He wouldn't sell now.
When everything's going up together, makes it harder to differentiate on a technical basis. He compares stocks head to head using charts to see which are outperforming.
Right now, NVDA has been the highest ranked stock in US reports, and that's the one he holds. In Canada, CLS has been the highest-ranked stock, and his portfolios hold that as well. MU has been trailing a bit, but might catch up, hard to say.
CLS is nearing a 7% position in our growth model portfolio, and with other names also running higher in the model portfolio, its position size can shrink. We continue to like its momentum and our strategy has been to let it run so far. Forward growth is still expected to be high due to demand from the hyperscalers, and we see this demand lasting for another 12-18 months or so, at least. Position sizing is personal, but for now we have let it run its course in the model portfolio.
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free
Nice run. An AI play on data centres. Very aligned on spending of hyper-scalers like AMZN, MSFT and GOOG. Margins quite low, around 5%. But getting volume on very strong demand. Momentum stock.
Future growth and success predicated on capex spending beyond 2024, which hasn't been announced. Be cautious. Once growth rate starts to turn, stock will pull back.
Broke trend, rallied, but made a lower high. Now making a lower low. He has a very low weight in tech, about 12%; whereas the S&P is about 28-29%. So many other things to do that are less crowded than tech. Technical setup not great; background for tech not as good as it was.