
TSE:BCE
Tough question. At this point, less downside than upside. Down ~50% from highs; if you didn't get out earlier, tough it out. Consider adding a bit more. He'd say 50/50 chance dividend gets adjusted. US acquisition will require hefty capex, and that's what spooked the market.
What's changed is that in the last conference call, management suggested the dividend is under review, with the payout ratio "elevated". Institutional investors are encouraging BCE to cut it and use the savings to pay debt or fund growth. A cut could trigger a relief rally. The risk/reward isn't attractive.
He's not a betting man, but if he were he'd say yes.
We all know the bad story, but what's the good story? Great assets. Can immunize the balance sheet by raising equity. Could sell assets and perhaps rent some instead, stop the DRIP, cut the dividend. If dividend cut in half, stock may drop another 10%, but thinks many would step in to buy. Yield is 11.25%.
They need to change the CEO. Investors are totally perplexed by BCE's purchase of a US company--the strategy makes no sense. Expects someone to step in and radically change things. BCE does have a good balance sheet and assets and are raising the dividend (too far). The US expansion will be costly to compete down there. They should cut or remove the dividend. Everyone is telling BCE: do something. There's a mismatch in what they pay investors and their internal capital requirements.
All the telcos are in a competitive price environment, but this should moderate in 2025. Lower interest rates should benefit. Slower immigration is a slight negative, but Canada's numbers are still more positive than other G7 countries.
Market assumed sale proceeds from MLSE (asset wasn't cashflow positive, but sold for a good price) would be used to pay down debt. Ziply acquisition (accretive to cashflow, higher growth opportunities) really threw investors off. Stock trended down, investor sentiment negative. What they did was positive, but balance sheet is worrisome. Lots of tax-loss selling. Past peak of capex on fibre to the home, which should increase cashflow going forward.
Yield is now 12% or so, with a greater chance of being cut. Doesn't need to cut, but there might be pressure from institutional investors. Even if cut, will still be higher than other telcos. If you own, hold on.
Tough time for BCE, just look at the chart. Spooked the market with expansion plans that people weren't anticipating. People own it for the dividend, lately that's been in question, could be cut down the road. Trading ~11x earnings, yield over 10%.
Hard to sell when you're down this much, so hold and wait for a turnaround. You're giving up too much value to just say I'm down, and I don't want to see it anymore. Hopefully, there's some rebound down the road. The things you could transition into would likely have less value.
The yield is 11.4%. She used to own this for income, but sold it when they announced they bought the US telecom; BCE will need to spend to build that new company. Meanwhile, capital spending in Canada is rising and eventually peak. Only then, will BCE pay down debt. Yes, the dividend is high, but the street is asking why it's so high. Meanwhile, the Canadian wireless is competitive while immigration is declining, impacting subscriber growth in telcos.
Won't be another Nortel, but whether the dividend is safe is a good question. He sold mainly on concerns about growth. Shocked market with risky US acquisition, rather than paying down debt to make dividend more sustainable. Management forgot who their shareholders are, those wanting safe income.
Says dividend is on hold, which smells as though it'll be cut in the next year or so. Pitiful share price indicates that market's pricing this in. Yield is over 10%.
He owns Telus and QBR.B.
A dividend cut is now being considered since the payout ratio is elevated. They could then use the money saved for paying down debt. He feels that the risk-reward is not attractive enough.