
TSE:SLF
This summary was created by AI, based on 9 opinions in the last 12 months.
Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) has garnered mixed reviews from experts, reflecting a blend of cautious optimism and concerns about its business model transformation. Originally focused on Canadian lifecos, the company has shifted towards mutual fund management, attracting criticism for taking on increased market beta. While some analysts acknowledge positive aspects, such as the potential benefits from rising interest rates and a robust money management division, others express concerns regarding recent challenges in asset management and the entry into private credit markets. Fundamentally, SLF trades at a comparatively lower P/E ratio than Canadian banks, but experts note that the growth rate remains modest. Overall, while the stock has rallied recently, many experts advocate for a cautious approach towards new investments, balancing potential growth against broader economic risks.
Statistically this is slightly cheaper and slightly more attractive than Manulife (MFC-T). However, Manulife have been acquiring new businesses. They are going to have a 15 year tie-in to a major financial distributor in Asia. Sun Life has had a few problems, but they are turning that around. The focus for them is the growth of the private wealth business.
Right now there is a real dynamic trade-off between this company and Manulife (MFC-T). He owns both companies. With this one, you have a company with a slightly higher yield. Their last quarter had some disappointing elements because of their US subsidiary. They are well exposed to the US market. Much of their product is much less dependent on interest rates and equity markets. He thinks there is room to own both.
Doesn’t have much in the way of lifecos in his portfolios, which has been good up until now, but life insurance companies have the ability, unlike any other companies, to make money when interest rates go up. This really, really helps them. Part of the reason they have underperformed in the last while is because interest rates have been low, gotten lower, and then got lower than anybody thought possible. The surprise rate cut from the bank of Canada hasn’t helped. Should we see periods of A) higher rates and B) higher stock markets, this company is leveraged to benefit from that. If there is a change in the direction of these 2 things, that is where you want to be.
Stock has been performing pretty well. Came off recently with the recent interest rate move. 10 year rates to the downside hurts insurers short term. Longer-term he believes that interest rates will rise, which will benefit these companies. Also, with demographics being the way they are, there is more demand for financial and retirement products, and insurance companies are good with these types of products. Expects them to continue having good growth. Their division in the US is doing well on the asset management side. Yield of 3.84%.
Has liked the insurers better than the banks over the last year, especially if you think interest rates are gradually going to move up. A great stock to own if you want a very steady dividend. Insurance companies try to match their assets and their liabilities. If you have rising interest rates their liabilities are shrinking, and if equity markets are rising, their assets are increasing. This is a good time to own them. This one also has a very significant stake in wealth management in Canada, which he thinks you will see do quite well eventually. Balance sheet is in really good shape. There might be a dividend bump down the road.
Has always liked this because it is more North American focused and has never been totally happy with Manulife (MFC-T) and their far eastern type investments. Right at the moment, they are both running and look cheap. The yields are okay. Since the banks have sort of backed off here and not left many choices of where to go for yield and relative safety, insurance companies look pretty good at the moment.
Stock vs. Stock: MFC-T vs. SLF-T. Owns MFC-T and not SLF-T. MFC’S growth over the next 3 years is higher in each year over SLF-T. MFC-T’s PE ratio is slightly higher. SLF-T is a great company and has been outperforming MFC-T, but going forward MFC-T can pick up their business. With their growth rate in Asia and in asset management, they will do particularly well.