
TSE:MFC
This summary was created by AI, based on 27 opinions in the last 12 months.
Manulife Financial (MFC) has garnered mixed perspectives from various analysts, reflecting both its potential and current market position. While many experts acknowledge MFC's solid dividend yield and growth prospects, particularly in Asia, concerns about valuation and market conditions persist. The stock appears to be trading around 2x book value and has shown slow but steady growth, attracting attention from those looking for income rather than explosive growth. The consensus among experts is to proceed with caution and consider market pullbacks for optimal entry points, though some view the stock as a good long-term hold due to its stable dividend and cash flow. Overall, while there are positive signs, such as asset management improvements and capital growth, analysts advise careful monitoring given the mixed signals surrounding the broader financial sector's performance.
He likes the insurers, and feels they are undervalued at this stage. This is trading at about 10X forward earnings, and BV is just over 1.1 or 1.2. Also, pays a pretty decent dividend of 3.4%. The reason it has dropped off along with other insurers is that there has been a bit of a scale back on long-term interest rates, and insurers are really based on where interest rates are going on the 5 and 10 year rates. He likes their exposure in Japan and other parts of Asia.
He likes this company. There was a run up last year on the anticipation of higher interest rates and inflation coming back. That didn’t happen, so the stock has calmed down. Earnings are being reported, and they are good and solid. ROE of about 11%-12%. He likes this longer-term, because it is capital market intensive as well as their growth in Asia.
Canadian Banks versus lifecos? He is a bigger fan of the lifecos. Manulife (MFC-T) and Sun Life (SLF-T) are going to get a big boost from rising interest rates. It is already starting to happen. The yield curve is steepening. Lifecos have been suffering and living with low interest rates for a long time. Both companies are also quite global. They have big presences in the US and in Asia. He sees a better earnings growth over the next few years.
Move into banks instead? He likes the banks more. This company’s story on paper is pretty good. They’ve gone from being insurance centric to wealth management, which has that reoccurring fees. They’ve done a lot of things well. Interest rates are eventually going to go up, and this company is going to benefit. However, if you are not making money for your shareholders, it is a waste of time. He would make that move.
Bought this for his equity platform on its break-out in late 2016, and sold it in the early part of this year. He still holds it in his income platform because it has a pretty darn good dividend. Doesn’t think there is a lot of downside. If you are happy holding the stock and collecting the dividend, there is going to be a fair amount of support at around $22, and he wouldn’t worry about it.
All the financials had a big, big move, and this was probably one of the greatest recipients of this bump in Canada. In terms of an overall stock, their valuation is reasonable. It looks like they are putting some improvements in place with the John Hancock business, which has been a huge headache. ROE is still lower than its competitors. (See Top Picks.)
The insurance company he would be a buyer of today. The nice thing is the global diversification. You are getting the US business, the asset manager and the underwriting life insurance business, but more importantly you are getting the Asian exposure, in particular China. If you just tuck this away, as rates creep higher globally and the insurance markets heal, it’s a company you need to own.