
TSE:BCE
This summary was created by AI, based on 44 opinions in the last 12 months.
BCE Inc. is viewed as a stable yet challenged investment, primarily recognized for its high dividend yield of around 5%, which many see as a reliable income source amidst current pressures in the telecom sector. The company has faced significant stock price declines due to increased competition, especially from emerging technologies like Starlink, leading to a cut in its dividend by 56% to maintain a sustainable payout ratio. While many experts highlight BCE's potential in the AI and data center space, they express caution about its core operations, with concerns over limited growth prospects and competitive pricing pressures. The consensus is that BCE may serve better as a defensive investment with modest future appreciation rather than as a growth stock. Analysts suggest monitoring BCE's strategic moves in the evolving telecom landscape, including its recent US acquisition and infrastructure investments, to gauge long-term viability.
BCE is more like a bond, given less growth than POW. POW will outperform this year. Insurers have done very well in the past year. Great-West Life is 70% of POW, now trading at a 30% discount to NAV vs. its historic 15-20% discount, so should gain momentum on this alone. The insurers are a little better than the telcos now.
Interest rates went up further than he thought, and bond proxies fell. Balance sheet now more stretched, recent acquisition has led to questions on best use of capital. 5% dividend growth, but investors are questioning wisdom of that use of cash. 17.7x PE is not cheap. This name will work over the next few years.
He doesn't think a 5% weighting in a stock is crazy, it's very reasonable. If you have a lot of conviction in those companies, then that's where your weighting should be. Yield is around 7%. Won't reduce the dividend unless something really terrible happens. Extremely mature company, will grow with GDP plus or minus, highly levered.
Investors own for the dividend. He wouldn't overweight his portfolio with it, but makes sense for a certain demographic.
Happy to own and add. Compelling yield, which will continue to grow at a mid-single digit pace. Lots of headwinds for indebted households and business, especially in Canada. So he's focused on companies that cater to needs, not wants. Right in the middle of the fairway of that. Good stable grower, dividend compounder, undemanding multiple. Likes the mix of businesses.
(Brian is pleased to report to the viewer that his cat, who made its TV debut during Covid, is alive and well. With Brian's return to the studio, the cat is no longer upstaging him ;)
Dollar-cost average down or will it be a falling knife?
One: telcos fell this year because of rising interest rates. Two: BCE rolled out 5G, which is great, but consumers don't want to pay for it (it's pricey). The Canadian telcos are among the companies that have issued a lot of debt in recent years. They hold a lot of debt. Pays a 7.5% dividend yield, safe, but don't expect much growth unless rates fall in a big way (and he doesn't see a catalyst for that).
BCE dividend is north of 7%, while Rogers is not that high. BCE has media assets. Tends to increase dividend every year, so it's a bit more geared to income. For the more conservative and income-focused investor.
They both share the sports teams in Toronto.
Rogers tends to be more focused on the cellular side. With Shaw acquisition, you should see more growth in the West. Cell ads will come. More competition. More growthy and volatile. If you made him pick, he'd choose this one now, as the Shaw acquisition will help grow the company.