Transalta Corp (TA.TO)

Chart shows a massive bear in 2008, followed by a long corrective period through to the end of 2011, followed by a final down into this year. He sees a falling wedge during 2012-2013. These are usually bullish and usually breakout on an upside in a falling wedge. In a market like this, when you have so many stocks making new highs, if you can park some money into a laggard that is starting to turn, it is probably not a bad idea. If the volume is increasing at this time, you might have something.

Doesn’t see the growth here. Even the dividend is a little bit at risk because they are paying out close to 100% of their earnings as a dividend. Yield is probably okay for now. But he would not be putting more money into it.

Series D, 6.4% dividend is sent to reset in March 2016? He has veered away from this one. Still considered an investment grade credit but it is on the borderline. There are a number of issues so it is a weaker credit. Some of the assets that they have need to be refurbished.

Historically it has drifted down to these kinds of levels, and then had enormous runs as things have picked up again. There has also been some balance sheet erosion because they are paying out too much in terms of dividends. Given the yield that they have, the dividend should be cut somewhat.

8.5% dividend. He would say it represents a note of caution. Thinks they will be able to ultimately maintain their dividend but it will be close. Their old coal fired generation will be retired and they will be forced to take on new methods of generation. Would not accumulate but hold for the dividend. Watch it with a negative bias.

Owns this and considers it a problem child in his portfolio. Has been struggling. Their coal-fired plants out West are facing replacement requirements. They just don’t seem to have a lot going for them. Keeps hoping they will cut a better deal in Alberta to give them a little bit more wiggle room. Dividend of about 7%. There have been times in the past when they have not earned their dividend but continued to pay. Expects this will be the pattern in the future. Getting a little concerned that if we don’t see any improvement in operating levels, at some point in time that dividend could be in danger.

High payout ratio. Management says they will not cut it. May be prudent to cut it so it may not be safe. 8.6% dividend.

(Market Call Minute.) The dog stock of the decade. Doesn’t have any growth. Coal fired power plants.

Most of the utilities fit into his thought that they are yield only and not much growth. Bottom feeding mentality really fits in here because it has been in a downtrend 4 years. Would prefer something like Innergex Renewable Energy (INE-T), which has some growth.

Very mature power electric company. Recently spun out their renewable power portfolio. Good yield of 8.4% which she thinks is safe. Doesn’t see a lot of growth in the dividend.

(Market Call Minute) Dividend is in question.

Spun off their renewables power portfolio. Provides a very attractive yield and she feels the dividend is safe. Doesn’t see a lot of earnings and cash flow growth for the next few years. Sees greater growing increasing cash flow and increases in the distributions/dividends in other investments in that general income category.

Has a decent yield but not much potential for a dividend increase over the next couple of years anyway. There is some potential in 2015 to 2017 to increase the dividends somewhat as contracts come off and they can sell power into the retail market. Spun out a portion of assets into a holding company, which was good, although those were good assets too. What you have left is the holding of the renewable company and a lot of aging assets, mostly coal generation plants in Alberta. Doesn’t expect a lot of upside in the stock price or dividends.

Last time he looked at this one, it was paying out almost all of its cash flow. Market is always concerned that there is going to be a dividend cut. Has some serious issues. Balance sheet needs to be restructured.

(Market Call Minute.) Huge payout ratio. Deteriorating asset quality.