
TSE:MFC
This summary was created by AI, based on 27 opinions in the last 12 months.
Manulife Financial (MFC) is viewed positively by numerous analysts, with many highlighting its robust growth potential, especially in the Asian market and wealth management. The company has successfully increased its dividend yield, currently sitting at approximately 4-5%, while its price-to-earnings (PE) ratio remains attractive compared to peers in the banking sector. Analysts have noted concerns over potential earnings drops but maintain a long-term positive outlook, suggesting that MFC is suitable for income-focused investors. While many emphasize the reliability of MFC's dividend and its strong position in life insurance, there are mixed feelings regarding its growth prospects compared to other financial institutions. Overall, the sentiment leans towards MFC being a solid choice for those seeking steady income and moderate growth, but some experts advise caution regarding market volatility.
Sees 16% in earnings growth over the next couple of years, along with 14% dividend growth. They just combined with an Asian bank to get exclusivity on insurance products. Have stumbled over the last couple of years. EPS has been missing on the core earnings, but they are on track for their 2016 plan. When interest rates go higher, this will be a beneficiary.
Low interest rates creates a real challenge for lifecos. This one has done a good job of transitioning from an insurance company to being more of a wealth management name. Their US wealth management is about 40% of their overall revenue. The real opportunity for them is in Asia and they have positioned themselves well to really compete in that space. He is looking at this name. 2.8% dividend yield.
In lifecos, this would be his favourite. It has the best growth including Asian growth. The catalyst will be that their spreads will widen as rates go up. They are not as sensitive to others as they hedged out in 2008-2009 when rates hit. Starting to give dividend increases which will become more regular. This will give you 8%-10% returns instead of the 5% that we have had.
You think of most financials as benefiting from high interest rates, as they are able to capture a higher spread when rates are rising. People like this one as they have a substantial business in the US. They are also able to grow in Asia. As long as you have lower and declining interest rates, that is a headwind for them.
Canadian banks or Manulife (MFC-T)? Until recently, he thought lifecos showed relatively better valuation than banks. The environment has got to the point now where flight to safety might be tilting a little bit more towards banks. Management has done a superb job since they were in trouble previously and had to cut their dividend. Have changed their product mix so that it is a lot less risky and less exposed to equity markets. Have really built up the wealth side of their business giving them good fees. Expanded in the US through John Hancock and are expanding into Asia quite a bit. A very good long-term hold.
He likes both MFC-T and SLF-T. He prefers lifecos over banks in Canada. MFC-T has taken down the sensitivity to the market. They are in line to hit their 2016 targets that they set a couple of years ago. The core businesses of both companies look good here.