
TSE:CVE
This summary was created by AI, based on 27 opinions in the last 12 months.
Cenovus Energy (CVE-T) is being positively regarded by various analysts for its strong positioning within the oil sector, especially due to its refinery margins and high-quality oilsands assets. The recent acquisition of MEG Energy is seen as a strategic move that could yield long-term benefits despite the current debt load. Many experts appreciate the company's management and operational improvements, along with an anticipated increase in cash flow due to higher energy prices. While some analysts note the acquisition's impact on debt management, the general sentiment is that Cenovus remains undervalued given current market conditions. With a robust dividend yield and a focus on shareholder returns, there is a balanced view on potential for future capital appreciation, despite some caution regarding market stability.
He sold it this year, because he was reducing his energy weighting. New managers have done well selling assets to reduce debt. Have also lowered costs. They don't have the refining capacity, so that's a problem. By 2020, the debt should be low enough to increase the dividend, though he had been expecting 2019.
It is down 15% in the past month, due to widening heavy oil differentials. With more rail capacity coming, it will support differentials near WTI less $23 – he is using $20 in his models. They are paying down debt and he thinks the worst is behind them. When stricter sulphur limits are imposed on marine fuels in 2020, he estimates this will have a $5 worsening impact on heavy differentials. However, he thinks this will ultimately lead to higher oil demand globally and higher oil prices.
Turnaround in progress. Integrating cost-cutting. New management has right-sized the ship. Risk is high exposure to WCS Canadian discount. But if oil prices continue to move higher, cash flow will benefit, they’ll pay down debt, and be in a good position going forward. Share pullback has created a good entry level. Yield is 1.7%. (Analysts’ price target is $17.08.)
He's added to his position. The market didn't like them buying Conoco's assets (overpaid); they took on a lot debt. But the new CEO has done well cutting costs. They've been hit by the WCS differential. This has a lot of room to move higher, levered to a higher oil price. De-leveraging will happen quickly with rising oil prices. This week's oil pullback is a buying opportunity. (Analysts' price target: $16.27)
Had there been 4 top picks this would have been the fourth. He really likes it. They bought Conoco assets last year. The street didn’t like the deal and lost confidence in Management. They have new Management now with a new CEO that is on the path of right-sizing the company and its balance sheet. It is looking really well now, particularly if we go to a 80 – 90 dollars barrel of oil.
The story is turning around here. He is modeling 55% cash flow growth 2018 to 2019. Trades at 5 times 2019 cash flow which is reasonable. The problem here is their balance sheet is 3.5 times debt to cash flow. This will come down if oil prices stay at these levels. A name you can own if you like oil.
Their Q1 production was 488,000 boe/day because of all their acquisitions but they reported losses from their hedge book. Their operating margin was $157 million cash versus $305 a year before, but they spent $522 million. The company has $9.8 billion of debt, up from 9.5 billion at the end of December. They have about a half billion dollars of assets for sale. They have $19.4 billion of equity. Book value (ex goodwill) is about $13.92, which is higher than the stock price. The dividend is about 5 cents per quarter. They have a new CEO. It is not clear where their growth will be. Schachter thinks they should focus on their thermal operations and get rid of their conventional-world assets. He is concerned about the balance sheet. The debt to equity ratio looks tolerable. He compared it to Whiting Petroleum, Chesapeake Energy and WPX Energy, all well-known American energy companies that are treated as very exciting but have much worse balance sheets. He sees the Canadian energy companies as value stories compared to the American ones. The bargains are in Canada.