
NYSE:TSM
This summary was created by AI, based on 43 opinions in the last 12 months.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSM) is recognized as a dominant player within the semiconductor industry, garnering significant market attention due to its unparalleled production capabilities and its crucial role in the AI revolution. The company enjoys a substantial market share, accounting for approximately 70% of the global chip market, primarily catering to major clients like Nvidia and Apple. Despite some geopolitical concerns surrounding Taiwan's relationship with China, many analysts point to TSM's robust growth, citing impressive revenue figures and a strong backlog of demand. Some experts suggest that now might be a good time to buy on dips or trim holdings, indicating mixed sentiments on valuation given its high PE ratio compared to growth prospects. Overall, TSM is viewed as a key component within diversified portfolios, with analysts generally optimistic about its future prospects.
Takes about 10 years to build a foundry, and you need access to water. So there goes Texas, Arizona, etc. In Japan, a foundry was rejected because they didn't want to divert water that's needed to grow food. Overhang of geopolitical risk of China invading Taiwan. Only 10% of foundries are in the US.
Great products. Leader. Alternative in Europe is ASML, which he owns. He wouldn't own both. No problems with TSM, but you have to understand geopolitical and cost risks.
His choice in the space. It makes the chips for NVDA and a whole slew of others. It's more diversified. Valuation is cheaper. Much clearer growth path going forward over next few years.
NVDA has fallen, but it's not a cheap stock. Factored into the share price is a huge growth expectation. Just because share price has fallen on a high flyer, that doesn't necessarily make it cheap.
Undisputed leader in leading-edge foundries, and it's been that way for several years. Has anything changed? Now branching out to the US, which gives geographic diversification. This may be costly, but it has pricing power.
Another reason it's done well is because competitors have done poorly. But INTC is getting its act together, and Samsung will at some point. Down the road (and it may be a long road), there will be some additional competition. But TSM will still be the leader. A staple in most growth portfolios.
Core holding in his global portfolio. Eaten INTC's lunch. Believes there's at least double-digit (10%) annualized upside over the next 5 years. Earnings will jump significantly this year with Arizona plant coming on stream. Growth over the next 2-3 years will be in the 15-20% annualized range.
Companies like NVDA must use TWM.
Didn't they say a few years ago they would build a plant in the U.S., but permitting, labour and other factors would make it costs 6x more. Trump is kidding himself that the most strategic Taiwanese company will move their IP of strategic importance to the US. Think about it. A great company and major beneficiary of AI. ETFs drive the valuation.
Checks all the boxes for his firm: big insider ownership, beautiful balance sheet, high FCF, high ROIC, decent valuation, gigantic moat. No one can do what it does. Overhang: what if someday China invades Taiwan? It would be bad not only for TSM, but also every AI-type company. Guiding for 20% compound growth over next 5 years.
His firm has always stayed away from semis, as they're very cyclical and easily disrupted (though this name seems more insulated). Capital intensive. He's on the fence, but feels overall that the better way to play AI is to own the Mag 7.
Great example of a direct AI beneficiary. World's leading foundry business -- they make all the chips for everyone. Completely dominant via size, scale, and expertise. Though spending billions on building fabs, it extends competitive advantage because no one can compete.
One of the few stocks you can still get at inexpensive valuations, due to Taiwan invasion risk. Concern is not going away, but it's not near term. Smart to offer Trump additional investment, but to be vague on the timeline. Strong demand for US production, but it will come at higher costs of production.