
TSE:TRP
This summary was created by AI, based on 19 opinions in the last 12 months.
TC Energy (TRP) has garnered mixed reviews from experts, reflecting a range of sentiments on its valuation and growth prospects. Many analysts express concerns about its high price-to-earnings ratio, which hovers around 20-23x, making it appear expensive compared to its growth rate of approximately 5-6%. While the company boasts a stable and contracted cash flow model, particularly in the natural gas sector, some experts suggest waiting for a better entry point due to the current high valuations. Others highlight its strong project backlog and potential for growth in the clean energy space, emphasizing its resilience against commodity price fluctuations. Overall, while it is seen as a solid long-term hold, the prevailing sentiment is to be cautious amid rich valuations and lookout for more favorable buying opportunities.
TRP P/E at 19X compares with its 10-year range of 12 to 19x so it is certainly on the high end of the range. EPS growth as noted is not going to be spectacular. The stock is trading for its yield of 4.74% and its safety going into a possible recession. Business is historically stable and the tax-adjusted yield is certainly attractive vs fixed-income alternatives. We are comfortable with it, but more as an income security and would not expect big gains here. It's up 33% in the past year and we doubt that rate is sustainable, certainly. The debt is nothing new of course, and common for the sector. Lower rates will help here. It has 13 BUYS, 10 HOLDS and 3 SELLS. Avg. target price $73.37. We would consider it 'buyable' slightly lower. Our main comment here references the 'riskier' note in the question. IF we head into a period of weakness, we would prefer to own TRP over dozens of other.
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free
All these companies carry heavy debt. Once slip up and their cash flow is in trouble. He prefers companies with high cash flow and low capex, like Apple and Meta. Not for him, but if interest rates continue to fall in Canada, dividend stocks like this could look stable and attractive. Pays a good 4.7% dividend.
Defensive assets are garnering less and less of a bid as people become more comfortable with economic risk. Used this name as a source of cash to add more beta to portfolios. Great company, but relative price performance has started to back off for the pipelines group. Pipelines carry a lot of debt, and financing costs could get more expensive if long-term yields stay high.
This is the one he likes in the space. Part of its business is very utility-like. Steady dividend, which will rise over time. Dividend also looks attractive in the face of an economic slowdown when interest rates would fall. Hold for the long haul.
More pipeline builds would certainly be an opportunity for growth for this name, but that's not why he owns it.
One of his key energy holdings. Is more opportunity to invest in the US, so there is growth, despite being a highly levered company.