
TSE:SGY
This summary was created by AI, based on 7 opinions in the last 12 months.
Surge Energy Inc (SGY-T) is seen as a well-managed, conventional oil producer primarily operating in Saskatchewan and Alberta, with an impressive production portfolio consisting of 90% oil and 10% gas. The company effectively utilizes advanced waterflooding technology, yielding consistent and strong results quarter after quarter. Despite its promising performance and a solid dividend yield of around 5–7%, analysts express concerns regarding its small market cap, which limits institutional interest and overall visibility in the market. The stock trades at favorable valuations compared to larger peers, and although it may have underperformed relative to larger oil companies, it demonstrates strong potential for growth, appealing especially to small-cap sector investors seeking income.
He wouldn’t own this. Doesn’t have an utter conviction in management. Trades at a discount multiple relative to its peers, but would suggest that some of that has been through poorish execution over the past couple of years. There was also an over reliance on debt, which they’ve done a good job of paying down. There is lingering concern about inventory at one of their key growth plays. It’s fine, but there are other names he would prefer.
(Top Pick Sep 6/16, Up 36.60%) They had wells that just came on and they have now revised their numbers upward. It seems fully valued to him right now. The fourth quarter results will be out in a number of months and if the price of crude backs off then he would be looking at this a lot more constructively.
This has taken a bit of a pounding over the last couple of years, but has been going up quite nicely this year. The main seasonal period where energy does well is from February 25 to May 9. That is because of supply imbalances that happen. He starts to look a month before hand, starting in January. The chart shows a bit of an ascending triangle, which is bullish.
A name he would not own. You need to have confidence in the direction of the company and the management team. It has been a history where there has been some slight over promotion of certain assets. It does offer high product leverage to an increase in the oil price, because a degree of their oil production has medium gravity, so it would get extra juice from an increasing oil prices. Looking at some of its peers, he would rather pay a little bit more and be a little more comfortable in what he is owning.
This has the Shaunavon play in Saskatchewan, and the Valhalla water flooding play in Alberta. The new royalty regime in Alberta is coming in, where companies pay 5% royalties for 9 years. They get a real benefit from water flooding, starting January 2017. He has a $3.70 target for Q4, 2017. If this came down below $2, it would be a fabulous Buy.
Thinks they have not met expectations. There was a bit of a management change a couple of years ago. They went through a process of increasing the dividend every couple of months, and then the dividend kind of went the other way. They were very acquisitive and doing a deal every couple of months, and then selling the same assets months later. The payout ratio is still too high.
This has gone through some tough times. Management has not changed, but there has been a bit of flip flopping in terms of market perceptions of what management has been saying. Thinks they have reached a level of sustainability around spot prices today, where they can match their dividend and maintain CapX so that they can maintain production. Even if oil were to go up another 10%, they have started to talk about introducing growth back into the equation. He has been in and out of this. There are a few other juniors he prefers. (See Top Picks.)
A nice little oil/gas producer. Before investing in any commodity stock, make sure you have a view of where the commodity is going. The energy area has been a particularly brutal area in the last 1 ½ years. Right now you really have to pay attention to 1) where you think the oil prices are going and 2) look at the balance sheet and make sure it is at under 2X debt to EBITDA or cash flow. Hasn’t looked at their balance sheet recently.
You need a positive outlook on energy. Looking at the pricing curve, he is seeing $50 out in a year or 2. Some people are predicting production will have dropped enough that inventories will be down by the end of this year, leading to higher oil prices. Companies like this are already reflecting $50-$60 prices for oil. His concern is whether these companies will be around long enough. This company has more debt than he would like, so he is avoiding these companies. Too risky for him.
A decent company, but some of their NETBACKS haven’t been as strong as some of their peers. There is a little bit of pencil sharpening to do. Their decline rate is roughly 23%, so that is negative.