
TSE:NA
This summary was created by AI, based on 13 opinions in the last 12 months.
Experts generally express a positive outlook on National Bank of Canada, highlighting its strong position in the Canadian banking sector, especially after the acquisition of Canadian Western Bank. Many point to its focus on wealth management and the ability to generate recurring high fees, positioning it well for future growth in a volatile market environment. There is an expectation of double-digit earnings growth, making it attractive for long-term investors. However, some experts caution about high valuations and potential economic challenges ahead, suggesting a mixed approach of buying and taking profits. Overall, the sentiment reflects confidence in the bank's fundamentals, albeit with a note of caution regarding market conditions.
Feels the yield is certainly sustainable. Payout ratio is around 50% so wouldn’t worry from a dividend point of view. Probably the only bank among the larger ones that has tested its 52 week lows already. Quite often that is a good place to be looking to buy. This year people are going to be more worried about loan losses in the banks, particularly if interest rates start to get pulled up. On valuation he thinks the banks are pretty good investments longer-term.
This has been a dog compared to some of the other financials, and is not a space that looks stellar. There is a little bit of a base being built currently. If it breaks down to the $37 level, there may be something that we don’t know. Doesn’t see a huge catalyst to the upside right now. Dividend yield of 5.2%.
Most banks in Canada have little underlying oil exposure (3% of total loan book). Their energy debt is more connected with larger companies. Earnings and ROEs have been compressed because of corporate and personal loan growth. The BOC could cut rates and that would cut net interest income from the Canadian banks. In 2016, multiple expansion will be constrained in Canada and he thinks there will be better entry points into banks next year. He prefers names with US exposure. NA-T is well capitalized, however.
Energy concerns have impacted the group. This is less exposed to that geography, but they tend to be more capital markets based. In this past quarter, capital activity has not been as strong. This bank tends to be more capital market sensitive, so lower multiples are generally assigned to companies like this. Her preference is for the banks that have some non-Canadian exposure.
Loves this bank. It was the best performer coming out of the 2008 recession. It was the fastest dividend grower and had the best earnings growth because of its exposure to wealth management and capital markets. This year not so much. It had some trouble with write-downs. It was a surprise that they had assets in Germany.
All the Canadian banks have come under a lot of pressure, but this one has the most exposure, pound for pound, to energy. He is not sure that all the energy exposure has really been priced into the banks. A lot of companies have hedged their energy prices up higher, and those hedges still haven’t rolled off yet. This will be under energy related pressure for at least 6 months.