Magna Int'l. (A)MG.TOBUY ON WEAKNESSMay 08, 2023Stock price when the opinion was issued
As of Jun 04, 2026. Market Open.
In 2021, they invested heavily in EV, but the demand didn't materialize. Since then, they've suffered that overhang, plus the impact of tariffs. But they fixed these problems with Chinese OEMs and have gained market share in smart door handles and driverless systems. Are gaining market share. Doing a great job.
Very hesitant. Recent recovery has been sharp and quick, almost as though it's factoring in abolition of tariffs completely. We need more clarity on tariffs. Auto industry is highly cyclical and depends on health of the economy, and we're seeing signs of weakening.
If you own it, don't need the cash, and have a 5-10 year time horizon, you should be fine. But there could be further weakness from here.
It won't pull back much from here. Given tariffs, this space is uncertain, but eventually we will settle this tariff war. Auto manufacturing is so emeshed between both countries that it would take a very long time to rejig it. This or Linamar are fine, but Magna pays a higher PE, though trades at a higher price-to-book. Your horizon must be long to own this, like 3-4 years.
Don't yet know how things are going to shake out. Rhetoric is at an all-time high. Short term, it's impacting our economy because the US is our largest trading partner. Reality is that there's a lot of value-added auto manufacturing in both Canada and US; the 2 countries are inextricably linked. Tariffs will be punitive for both Canada and the US.
Hope is not an investment strategy, but we have to hope that rational heads can prevail so that there continues to be a steady flow of goods across our borders.
MG reported EPS of $1.49 beating estimates of $1.18, and revenues of $14.34B beating estimates of $13.35B. Sales grew by 11% for the quarter, which was well above the global light vehicle production growth of 3%. Management raised its EBIT margin outlook to 4.7% to 5.1% from 4.1% to 5.1%. Its Adjusted EBIT declined for the quarter, from $507M to $437M. This year-over-year decline is largely a result of higher net production input costs, operating inefficiencies at a facility in Europe, and higher net engineering costs. We feel that these were strong results that beat estimates and included a guidance raise, but it did issue debt for the quarter and was cash flow negative. We continue to like the name but feel that it needs to see some of the near-term headwinds lifted before we become overly excited about its opportunity.
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free