
TSE:MFC
This summary was created by AI, based on 27 opinions in the last 12 months.
Manulife Financial (MFC) is viewed positively by many experts, who highlight its strong performance in Asia and robust wealth management services. The company is seen as a good long-term investment, particularly due to its attractive dividend yield and relatively low price-to-earnings ratio compared to banks. However, there are concerns regarding short-term earnings fluctuations, particularly in alternative portfolio results and U.S. operations. Market analysts suggest that while the stock has had a good run, cautious investors should watch for strategic entry points, as some believe it may be susceptible to macroeconomic challenges. Overall, the sentiment is that MFC is a solid income stock with potential for growth as it continues to navigate its complex business landscape.
This insurance company versus banks? They have done a good job of moving the company in the right direction. Where insurance companies really make money is in a much higher yield environment. He thinks interest rates are going to stay relatively low for longer than people think, so that really hurts this industry. He would rather put his money in a bank, which has better opportunities.
Banks or Insurers? He thinks he would lean more towards lifecos at this point on a longer-term basis. There is a little bit of risk on this one short-term, which is why there was a selloff. There is still real leverage within the portfolio regarding higher interest rates and stronger stocks. There might be a little bit of earnings risk on this so he wouldn’t put all of your money in.
He likes this. When interest rates normalize and equity markets continue to move forward, companies like this will do well. They have a huge exposure in Asia, which is a growing market. The concerns right now are about international markets, but those are short-term concerns. This is well-positioned for the long-term. Pays you well over a 3% yield with probably a 10% growth rate on that yield over the next 3 years.
This is an OK situation now. He prefers Sun Life (SLF-T) or Power Financial (PFC-T). A lot of their projections to future growth are built on continuing success in China. He has a bias against that type of situation. He has watched what has happened to other companies that are operating in China. If there is ever a political problem, you get nailed.
Part of her investment thesis on this is that interest-rates are going to go up, which will help this company’s investment portfolio. The fallout from the 2008-2009 collapse is largely behind them now. The new CEO seems to be relatively more conservative than the previous one. Increased their dividend by 19% last quarter. Acquired Standard Life which will expand their presence in the low volatility business and gives him a good share in Québec. There will be some cross-selling of product later this year or early next year. Dividend yield of 2.92%.
Their recent acquisition of Standard Life to gain a foothold in Québec wasn’t a blow out acquisition and was a little expensive. With these types of companies, you are always going to get a little volatility when markets go down. He owns a bit of this company, and is somewhat constructive on it, really relating to their insurance. If you can, factor out the equity and the fixed income components and focus on what the CEO has been talking about as core, how well they are selling insurance. They seem to be doing quite well.
Both MFC-T and SLF-T benefit from the same trends. Over time rates will rise and benefit their businesses. SLF-T has a stronger balance sheet. SLF-T talked about returning capital in the form of a dividend and share buybacks next year. He would wait until a hint of rates going up.