
TSE:MFC
This summary was created by AI, based on 28 opinions in the last 12 months.
Manulife Financial (MFC) has garnered mixed reviews from experts, reflecting a range of perspectives on its current standing and future potential. Several analysts highlight the company's strong dividend yield and its robust performance in Asia, suggesting it may be a worthwhile long-term investment, particularly for those seeking income rather than growth. However, concerns regarding earnings fluctuations, market pullbacks, and comparisons with peers like Sun Life Financial indicate that MFC may not be as attractive as other options in the life insurance sector. Many experts recognize the potential for capital appreciation, yet they caution that the stock faces headwinds, especially when considering broader market dynamics and the performance of similar financial institutions. There is a prevailing sentiment that the stock remains a reliable choice, albeit needing careful monitoring amidst potential market corrections.
New management seems to be focusing on their core results, pretty much selling insurance, and have mandated a pretty good target going forward. In the last quarterly earnings results, he saw some of the equity and investment return come back into that core number, so they are getting a bit blending as to whether they are selling insurance or are they investment gains. Low interest rates is a very big factor in insurance companies.
This insurance company versus banks? They have done a good job of moving the company in the right direction. Where insurance companies really make money is in a much higher yield environment. He thinks interest rates are going to stay relatively low for longer than people think, so that really hurts this industry. He would rather put his money in a bank, which has better opportunities.
Banks or Insurers? He thinks he would lean more towards lifecos at this point on a longer-term basis. There is a little bit of risk on this one short-term, which is why there was a selloff. There is still real leverage within the portfolio regarding higher interest rates and stronger stocks. There might be a little bit of earnings risk on this so he wouldn’t put all of your money in.
He likes this. When interest rates normalize and equity markets continue to move forward, companies like this will do well. They have a huge exposure in Asia, which is a growing market. The concerns right now are about international markets, but those are short-term concerns. This is well-positioned for the long-term. Pays you well over a 3% yield with probably a 10% growth rate on that yield over the next 3 years.
This is an OK situation now. He prefers Sun Life (SLF-T) or Power Financial (PFC-T). A lot of their projections to future growth are built on continuing success in China. He has a bias against that type of situation. He has watched what has happened to other companies that are operating in China. If there is ever a political problem, you get nailed.
Part of her investment thesis on this is that interest-rates are going to go up, which will help this company’s investment portfolio. The fallout from the 2008-2009 collapse is largely behind them now. The new CEO seems to be relatively more conservative than the previous one. Increased their dividend by 19% last quarter. Acquired Standard Life which will expand their presence in the low volatility business and gives him a good share in Québec. There will be some cross-selling of product later this year or early next year. Dividend yield of 2.92%.
Their recent acquisition of Standard Life to gain a foothold in Québec wasn’t a blow out acquisition and was a little expensive. With these types of companies, you are always going to get a little volatility when markets go down. He owns a bit of this company, and is somewhat constructive on it, really relating to their insurance. If you can, factor out the equity and the fixed income components and focus on what the CEO has been talking about as core, how well they are selling insurance. They seem to be doing quite well.