
TSE:CSH.UN
This summary was created by AI, based on 9 opinions in the last 12 months.
Chartwell Retirement Residences (CSH.UN-T) is seen positively by experts, primarily due to the compelling market dynamics driven by an aging population in Canada and a limited supply of retirement homes. Analysts highlight the company's strong occupancy rate of over 95%, its ability to increase rents in line with growing demand, and its strategy of growth through acquisitions, raising concerns only about its reliance on treasury stock issuance for financing. While some experts acknowledge high volatility in the stock and its elevated price-to-earnings ratio compared to peers, they remain bullish on long-term growth prospects propelled by demographic trends. Overall, Chartwell is positioned as a leading player in the private-pay retirement sector, reflected in its projected increases in earnings and occupancy rates, with strong support from the market.
A good, long term play. They have one of the largest public portfolios in Canada. A very attractive asset for perhaps a US company that is looking to expand, or perhaps a Canadian pension fund. If nothing happens, you collect a very good dividend. This is slow, steady growth, and should do quite well in this low interest rate environment.
Stock vs. Stock. EXE-T vs. CSH.UN-T. EXE-T is more into nursing homes. CSH.UN-T is more focused on retirement care, which is privately funded. He would not be adding to it right now. EXE-T looks like it is trading at a slight premium to its NAV. CSH.UN-T is affected by the 4.5% cap rate that another was taken out at. It would have room to move in the case of a takeover, but is trading rich relative to other REITs otherwise.
(A Top Pick Nov 11/14. Up 17.65%.) Likes the seniors housing community. Everyone is getting older. Statscan just came out that presently the 65+ population is about 16% of the Canadian population. They envision that in 15 years it is going to be 25%. Penetration rate is still very low in Canada at about 8%, so she can envision that the demand will grow. This company divested their US assets and are focused in Canada. Pays a nice distribution of around 4%.
Really likes the seniors’ housing space in Canada. It is supported by great long-term demographics. The biggest issue in the last few years is that the sector has been oversupplied. This is probably the 1st year where you are going to see demand exceed supply. This will show up in higher occupancy and rent in 2016. Thinks there is at least an upside of $1-$2 next year, in addition to the healthy dividend yield.
Trading at 28X earnings. This is in an interesting part of the business, retirement residences, where there is a lot of future demand. Looking at the balance sheet from his perspective, the BV has been steadily going down. Those kinds of companies make him queasy. He likes to see companies where the BV is rising. There are better yields out there than this.
The sector is incredibly hot. They benefited from recent M & A activity in the sector. You had to deal with this US exposure in the past, but now they have cleaned up the balance sheet by selling the US assets. It is expensive because there is this underlying tone that all seniors housing will be bought out. It is a tough business with a lot of regulations. It has outperformed because of the repositioning and restructuring. He preferred ACC-T, but he exited the space in favour of apartments.
Senior housing and senior living has seen a lot of M&A activity. A lot of the US REITs are coming up to Canada to pick away at some of our assets, as valuations are cheaper and Cap rates (the net operating income generated versus the cost to buy them) are higher. Currently it is a little bit expensive. Price to AFFO is 17X. Dividend yield of close to 5%. He would prefer Sienna (SIA-T), which has a higher yield and a lower payout ratio and trading at a Price to AFFO of 13X.
Thinks this has further upside. There is the possibility of a takeover, as there is so much demand from Canadian and American institutions for this sector. Because of that, you could see significant upside. If it doesn’t, this is still an excellent company. The challenge is that there is a real estate component and an operating component. The company has always been looked at from a real estate value of about $12 a share, but that operating business is worth something, especially when you are the only remaining public operator and you have an excellent reputation. Should be a core holding of every portfolio. Yield of 4.43%.