Brookfield Asset Management (BAM.TO)

Very well run. Owns this in his firm's growth mandate. Huge capital resources from the parent company. JV with CCO and US government is a massive $80B, huge runway. Lots of smaller companies are wannabees, but there's only one Brookfield. A nice place to invest.

Good question. The asset management piece is narrower than the entire Brookfield. It's a great, well-run company, so either one is fine. Overall, parent company might be a bit better longer term. But from time to time the asset management business will shine because of specific things going on in its universe.

As to which is better, it's a coin flip at any point in time.

Third-party wealth and asset management. Huge part of the BN stable of subsidiaries. BN owns part of this one, so his firm owns it indirectly by owning BN. No quarrel with owning.

Chart shows a bit of a basing pattern. Has gone sideways this year. Lets you stand on the shoulders of people who can see a bit further in this world and are good at picking up investments. Core holding, buy today. He also owns BN. See his Top Picks.

Sensational performer since it was spun out. Has had a meaningful re-rating, partially resulting from controversial decision to be domiciled in the US; this allows them to be included in large US indices, benefitting from passive ETF buying. Will do well, but likely won't outpace the parent BN to the same extent as the last number of years.

Analysts say price is overvalued. Q2 results have not come out yet; EPS missed before, so she's keeping an eye. It's a hold for her right now. Decent yield of about 3%. 

The closer you are to the top of the house in the Brookfield framework, the closer you are to the CEO and the Board, and the incentive structures tend to favour them. Doesn't have the great yield, but has upside. BAM offers you the yield and, broadly speaking, growth aspects. He'd encourage you to stay near the top of the house, depending on how much yield you need for your life circumstances.

For BIP.UN, it's not really whether Mark Carney got elected or not, or tariffs, because it's a global business. Infrastructure, toll roads, coal, etc. Very diversified. 

Income stream from asset management. Trading very richly compared to projected earnings and to peers. Wouldn't buy at these levels.

His higher conviction for a long-term hold would be with the parent, BN.

Has done quite well, as has that whole space. Under nice, steady accumulation. Solid uptrend.

One of his go-to names in the Brookfield suite. If you're after growth, look at BN; the parent that owns all the entities underneath, including a big chunk of BAM. Private asset markets are still quite strong. Good for the younger folks who are looking for more torque higher.

BAM deals with third-party capital that comes in. Higher dividend, but perhaps a bit less growth. Good if you're in retirement or approaching it. Neat that it's done as well as BN, but you're getting the nice dividend too.

Both in client TFSAs.

Long term, prefers BN to BAM. However, short term, hearing discussions about redomiciling to New York and being included on US indices. This would likely catalyze some demand. There's a good case for making this play.

He owns BN, a better place to go, and it owns 75% of BAM. He always likes to stand next to the guys driving the bus. BN has all the benefits of BAM and its subsidiaries, plus huge real estate portfolio which is valued at almost nothing right now.

He prefers BN to BAM. BN is the controlling shareholder of BAM, among others. Significant insider ownership of BN. Likes the broader base of earnings, plus that's where management's strategic thinking is focused.

Great Canadian company, well diversified. Oaktree deal turned out great, given this market. Good, disciplined capital allocators. Good alternative asset story to stick with. Will benefit as real estate starts to recover.