Chartwell Seniors Housing

CSH.UN vs. Sienna A tough call. He owns both. Loves their yields and their valuations have plunged. Nursing homes remain a growth area. Sienna has more problems than Chartwell--Sienna was faulted in the Canadian army report about seniors' deaths in their homes. Chartwell is the stronger play, due to fewer cases in their homes. Both are hamstrung now, because they can't offer tours to prospective clients or allow visitors. This will effect occupancy rates in the short term. (His mother is in a retirement home.)

SIA-T vs. CSH.UN-T. It was sad what the pandemic has done in the long term care sector. Sienna has had to make some difficult management changes. This is an important needs-based sector in Canada. In Ontario the government has to look how they can properly fund that business. With question marks on the horizon, he would focus on CSH.UN-T because it does not depend on government finding as much. They have done a phenomenal job during the pandemic.

People are now fishing for companies that were the most beaten up -- like airlines, etc. The long term thesis is still good for this space, but he sees other ways to play this. He would favour CSH.UN instead.

CSH.UN-T vs. SU-T. They seem to have nothing relating to one another. Both have had a difficult time. There is a logical answer to this. Falling interest rates are the single biggest supporter of real estate values. We are at or near generational lows in interest rates. If you saw reflation then commodity assets would start to participate. He would own SU-T or CNQ-T if he were to own something in energy. He owns SU-T. He would sell CHR.UN-T in order to buy SU-T.

She does not own Sienna. Their mix of long term care homes is much larger than others in the space. She has chosen Chartwell instead.