Believes 1) "peak/troughs" & 2) "past 200 days" are simplest way to look at markets.
All major indexes are pointing to upwards trend.
Believes caution warranted in markets as future uncertain.
Need to see break through on indexes before will start investing again.
Is waiting for upcoming actions of US Fed.
Expecting pain for the consumer with rising interest rates.
Advantage of DIY Investor: Tune out the noise. Professionals are constantly exposed to a barrage of investment information. The signal to noise ratio from the firehose of daily news is vanishingly small, while the cognitive toll is high. They are compelled to pay attention to short-term volatility which triggers the most destructive behavioural errors. DIY investors, on the other hand, have the luxury of tuning out the noise, developing a sound long-term strategy, setting it in motion, and checking our portfolios only when appropriate—perhaps every six to twelve months.
Would advise investors to keep equity portfolios well balanced given underlying strength of economy.
A 60/40 portfolio with fixed income/equities will do investors well.
High interest products are paying nice returns for defensive names.
High quality dividend stock are offering great opportunities.
Opportunity can be found in low priced tech stocks.
Advantage of DIY Investor: Choose investments based on appropriateness rather than compensation. Because the vast majority of financial advisors in Canada are compensated based on the investments they select for their clients, rather than by their clients directly, what is best for the investor is frequently at odds with what is best for the advisor. Put yourself in their shoes: as an advisor, would you suggest the broad-based mutual fund that will kick back a generous fee into your account, or the index fund that will pay you nothing but accomplish the same goal for the client and save them tens of thousands of dollars? The incentives of paid professionals can never be truly aligned with the investor.
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free
Hard to tell on a quarterly basis. As a general rule, they're in very good shape. Even though loan losses have continued to rise, that's a good thing because they can take them back into earnings when things aren't as bad as forecast. Lots of capital to increase dividends or buy back shares, not trading at extreme levels on book value. In his dividend portfolio, he owns TD, RY, CM, and BNS. These are great businesses over the long term. A lot of the quarters had one-off costs. Great things to buy and hold long term. They continue to make money.
Weird economic background. Coming out of Covid, we had lots of fiscal stimulus, and now part of that's falling off. Then we had massive monetary policy decreasing rates, and there's a long lag in that effect, which we haven't felt yet. Consumers have had lots of savings, and unemployment is not very high. They're not in as bad a shape as people think. Remember, we came out of a very difficult 2 years, and now people are making up for that. You're seeing inflation numbers really high on the services side, as people just want to live their lives again, and this number is what the Fed's trying to bring down. US consumers with mostly fixed mortgages aren't as sensitive to higher mortgage rates as they were in 2008 when most had adjustable-rate mortgages.
Problem with all these companies is that they increased costs because of Covid to an unreasonable level. They had to upgrade so quickly, and they just don't need those people anymore. Now there's a normalization of the economy and businesses, and so they have to get rid of people. All the layoffs have been tech-related.