50% off Premium Yearly

NYSE:UL
This summary was created by AI, based on 1 opinions in the last 12 months.
The review of Unilever PLC (UL-N) suggests that it may not be the best option for investors looking for safety and dividend growth. The sentiment is that while Unilever offers some value, experts recommend considering alternatives such as Nestlé or Procter & Gamble (PG) for similar characteristics in dividend yield and stability. The consensus points toward a cautious view on Unilever's positioning in the market, highlighting that its current branding and reputation may not align with a desirable investment status. Investors might want to rethink their choices, with the implication that other companies might provide better returns or less risk in similar categories. Overall, the recommendation leans towards reevaluating Unilever's offerings compared to its competitors, signaling a need for potential investors to be vigilant.
Same thing as applies to Nestle. You are getting a brilliantly run company but you are paying a very high price in the market. They are just on the watch list in case they come back down to earth.
It got an upgrade today from UBS, and rose 3.7%. The consumer space is getting killed by e-commerce, but Unilever has countered this trend by making strategic acquisitions. Last 5 years, total returns have been 15% vs. P&G's 2%. Unilever has mroe than 50% of its products in emerging markets which trust brands, so they can grow. Beta is low, because they deal in consumer staples. Has owned it for a long time.
He believes in the stock. You are getting earnings growth of roughly 10% a year, and revenue growth anywhere from 2% to 4%. They are a little on the low side now, but just sold off their spreads business, so they have $6 billion in cash. Their strategy going forward is to have subsidiaries which are high margin/high growth. They want to reduce costs and overhead, and get margins higher so that they can a) pay down some debt and b) continue the dividend growth and c) capture more e-commerce markets. 43% of revenues are in Asia, and nobody else is close.
Has held this for a number of years and thinks the emerging markets are beginning to stabilize. 57% of sales comes from emerging markets, and their target is to have 75% by 2020. The middle-class is growing, and as that happens, they will consume more of this company's products. They have homecare, personal care, beverages. Adopted zero based budgeting 2 years ago Dividend yield of 2.8%. (Analysts' price target is $60.)
If looking at the consumer product space, this is the one you want to focus on. This has 43% of revenues coming from Asia. On a broad scale, all the consumer product companies are running into a problem in that they have lost 3% of the global market share to e-commerce start-ups. Their focus right now is to cut costs. They’re starting to make acquisitions in areas that are higher margins, and where they have an e-commerce presence and can start to protect their turf.
(A Top Pick Sep 12/19, Up 5%) Global consumer staples and defensive. Has long owned this. They're growing their personal care division, which offers high margins, and accounts for 40% of revenues. Dove, Lux and Tresemme are some of their brands. 60% of their revenues are free emerging markets, which she expects to grow long term. Near term, developed markets will remain strong because of pantry loading and customers gravitate to well-known brands. UL were able to leap from 2 to 60 factories making hand sanitizer. A consistent dividend grower.