Summer Sale

50% off Premium Yearly

00days
00hrs
00mins
00secs

TSE:GFL

GFL Environmental Inc. (GFL.TO)

50.57
+0.27 (0.54%)
as of Jun 15, 2026, 3:30:05 pm Market Open.
51 watching
0
Investor Insights
star iconJun 15, 2026, 12:00 am

This summary was created by AI, based on 12 opinions in the last 12 months.

GFL Environmental Inc. has sparked a variety of opinions among experts, primarily surrounding its recent acquisition of SES, which has been met with mixed reactions. While some see this as a strategic move to strengthen GFL's market position, concerns about the company's debt levels and the overall valuation after the acquisition have surfaced. The general sentiment points to GFL's robust business model in the waste management sector, underscoring its non-cyclical nature and the necessity of waste services. However, analysts warn of potential execution risks during integration and suggest holding off on new investments until clearer indicators of stability emerge. Despite these factors, GFL's long-term potential remains appealing as it continues to identify growth opportunities and consolidate its position in the market.

consensus icon
Consensus
Mixed
valuation icon
Valuation
Fair Value
review icon
Similar
WCN
HOLD

Environmental services as a group have been performing well. Recently turned profitable. Lots of opportunity for consolidation. Technically doing well in a sloppy market.

BUY
Trevor Rose’s Insights - Trevor’s most-liked answers from 5i Research

EPS was essentially flat vs expectations of a tiny loss. Revenue of $1.8B beat estimates by 1.2%. EBITDA of $455.7M beat by 3.4%. GFL's revenue, Ebitda and free cash flow exceeded consensus, reflecting benefits from last year's solid-waste divestitures and efforts to shed low-margin contracts. Reported revenue was flat due to the 2023 divestitures but included 4% organic growth in solid waste, where price increases offset volume declines, and which drove 160 bps of segment margin expansion. Environmental Services revenue fell 10% organically amid reduced emergency-response activity. Free cash flow topped expectations, though GFL's net leverage rose to 4.3x due to a $322 million increase in debt. The company used C$112 million for acquisitions and expects to spend C$600-$650 million on deals for the full year. However, net leverage is still seen approaching 3.65-3.85x by year-end. Guidance WAS increased, but only marginally. The stock is not cheap at 44X earnings, but we still think it is buyable. 
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free

PARTIAL BUY

Very prominent brand (visible across Canada). Stock performance strong. High debt levels a concern. Unsure of future business given leverage. If debt falls, would expect better returns. Cheapest valuation in waste management space, however investors have to weigh risk of debt levels. Earnings very stable (sticky customers) with steady demand. 

HOLD
Trevor Rose’s Insights - Trevor’s most-liked answers from 5i Research

GFL operates a playbook of growing through acquisitions with a leveraged balance sheet, by consolidating small players in one industry (waste management). This playbook is usually referred to as a “roll-up”. GFL’s CEO has demonstrated a decent history of execution in the last few years, with 5-year revenue growth of around 18%. He also writes a good shareholder letter. As the founder, he has certainly delivered growth, with sales up 10X since 2015. This article from last year is a good read on him. GFL continues to reinvest heavily into growth. Due to the stability of the indusry, and recurring nature of the business, the debt level is quite high, with net debt/EBITDA consistently more than 5.0x. Valuation is reasonable compared to the historical average, 14.1x EV/EBITDA (historically range from 13.8x to 19x). Overall, a decent name, but investors need to be comfortable with the debt level and entrust the CEO with his capital allocation skills.
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free

PARTIAL BUY

There's room for growth as society puts more effort into disposing waste. A little volatile. Collecting garbage is moving towards automation. Operates in an essential, but growing sector.

DON'T BUY
Are in a great space, a growth area in industrials. But their debt is too high and explains their volatility. They grow by acquiring, which adds to debt. Managed well, though.
DON'T BUY
Right industry, but not preferred way to play. Higher leverage, weaker management, shorter operating history as a public company. He owns WM, best in class, "A" credit so borrowing is cheaper.
BUY
Waste management continues to be a great business. An area that's growing quite dramatically. A big player, will continue to do well, even with complications of being "green". Good structural growth despite volatility.
DON'T BUY
Company has struggled to make profits. Believes stock price is over valued. Will keep eye on company, but does not own stock. Better opportunities for investors elsewhere.
SELL
Yet to show itself a powerful earnings generator. Hardly pays a dividend. Growth strategy is mainly by acquisition, so you have to be wary. Hard to raise prices on its customers. Never hurts to take a profit. Shouldn't be a large part of your portfolio.
DON'T BUY
It's grown only by buying companies and carries a lot of debt. There's more pricing power now after consolidation in this space. But GFL trades at too high a multiple.
DON'T BUY

It is comparable to Waste Management but the valuations are rally high in that sector. There is not a huge amount of organic growth. It has made debt-fueled acquisitions. The valuation is too rich for him and the debt is too high. You have to get it at a much lower price.

DON'T BUY

He continues to own Waste Connections (WCN-T) and when this one IPO'ed there was no reason to switch. GFL-T had more debt and were growing quickly by acquisitions and levering up the balance sheet. He is unsure if they can grow at the same rate now that they are public. He would stick with others.

DON'T BUY
It is a relative newcomer on the markets. He does not buy IPOs. He is not a huge fan of the growth-by-acquisition strategy and the huge debt they took on to manage it. There are other companies that have been on the markets longer than this one.
Showing 16 to 29 of 29 entries