With resources you have to have a view on what it will do over the coming years. He owns next to no gold because he does not have a positive outlook for the next couple of years. Gold does not get consumed (most of it doesn’t), but rather gets stored as blocks. Look at what it has done over the last couple of years. He thinks gold will drop further until the trend gets broken. G-T is one of the best of the large cap producers. You should go with large cap gold producers if you must have one for diversification.
(A Top Pick Aug 20/18, Up 2%) This merged with another company and was taken out. He still likes the gold space. Central Banks are beginning to run on fumes and have no idea what problems they are causing for investors down the road. Gold is good in deflationary times and even better in inflationary times -- it doesn't do well in between.
He's never really owned Goldcorp, Newmont and Barrick. The share appreciation would come better from an Agnico Eagle or Kirkland Lake which have growing reserves, great management and low production costs. He stays away from companies like Goldcorp or Barrick or Newmont. In fact, Aginco has outperformed Goldcorp and will be self-sufficient by 2023. It pays a good dividend and they continue to grow overall.
Big relationship to US dollar, so dollar strength means gold weakness. Gold gets seasonally weak right now. May go sideways for a while. If it breaks the downtrend, it can accelerate pretty quickly. Second seasonality is in the summer, but could happen earlier. Timely to buy right now, and wait for the next shot up.
It is oversold as a consequence of being belittled by Barrick. It has a paucity of tier 1 assets. The trend of mergers of in the industry is going to be good for the company.
If Barrick buys Newmont and Goldcorp walks away with $630 million because the Newmont-Goldcorp deal (of last month) doesn't actually go through. Can GT shareholders kick the GT board out--the board who gets a hefty package, but not the shareholders? He can't comment on this though many are asking this question. About this deal, we haven't seen gold M&A deals for a while. From Barrick's point of view, this is an obvious plus. Many are surprised that this is the deal.
Today's merger with Newmont Mining Synergies will improve their margins. But he would sell--he doesn't like gold in general and this is a selling opportunity.
It could be 10% higher than today. He would prefer an equal weight gold ETF. G-T is probably a slight underperformer but he would buy gold stocks on a pull back.
The success of the 20/20/20 goals on cost reductions and production and cash flow growth will be the real test. They are trying to increase transparency of their strategy, now can they prove up on the execution? He would rather pay a little more for more consistency.
Sees nothing encouraging in the fundamentals here at all. Clawed its way back from its recent 18% drop. People are worried about gold prices not sustainable at the $1300 level. Wouldn't be a buyer. Lot of resistance above $14.
ABX-T vs. G-T. G-T is more the defacto go-to name. ABX-T does not have the growth any more. He thinks G-T has better assets. The problem with G-T used to be excessive valuation but that is not the case now.
With resources you have to have a view on what it will do over the coming years. He owns next to no gold because he does not have a positive outlook for the next couple of years. Gold does not get consumed (most of it doesn’t), but rather gets stored as blocks. Look at what it has done over the last couple of years. He thinks gold will drop further until the trend gets broken. G-T is one of the best of the large cap producers. You should go with large cap gold producers if you must have one for diversification.