TSE:CVE

Cenovus Energy (CVE.TO)

46.65
-0.28 (0.60%)
as of Oct 20, 2026, 8:00:00 pm Market Open.
888 watching
0
BUY

Only large cap name he holds in the fund. The on-going asset sales from the Husky purchase is a catalyst. They are well down the path of selling them to pay down debt. Once this is done, they should initiate a share buyback. Deep value with a catalyst for a re-rate.

COMMENT
Long term bearish on energy. However in the next 2-3 years, there has been underinvestment and this has lead to prices squeeze higher. Bullish for a trade. Buy dips and sell into strength. $100 barrel would be the upper limit for consumer demand. Could see some more upside before price becomes a problem.
DON'T BUY

Husky deal was reasonably priced and strategically sensible. Exploration and production is out of favour, especially the small players. Canada is hostile to oil right now. Rise in ESG investing increases cost of capital. Oil at the top of its $40-80 trading range puts a lid of profit for the producers.

TOP PICK

Ridiculously miss priced. Core focus is deleveraging the balance sheet. Looking strongly at monetizing non-core assets from the Husky acquisition. The stock is trading at 3.5x cashflow at current prices with 35% free cashflow yield. Using a 6x multiple, it can be a double. (Analysts’ price target is $12.75)

WEAK BUY
Impact of asset sales this year. Thinks they have the balance sheet now at 0.9x debt to cash flow. Has the cashflow to buy the shares back. It has dramatically turned around. Cheap at 3.5x. Seeing EPS growth. If you like oil and energy stocks, you could look at it. The commodity will dance around with politics and environmental impacts. A stock to trade.
PAST TOP PICK
(A Top Pick May 15/20, Up 87%) Only large cap he owns. The most near term catalyst. Has had time to digest the Husky assets. They have lots of assets that are non core that they can sell. The leverage they have taken on is being paid off faster than planned. At $60 oil, would trade at 9% free cashflow yield. At $70 it doubles.
PAST TOP PICK
(A Top Pick Apr 03/20, Up 181%) Bought Husky and gained scale. Became more integrated. It did take away some leverage to rising oil price. Took on debt they are aggressively paying down. Only large cap he owns right now. Highest free cashflow leverage, at 9% free cashflow at $60. Doubles at $70 oil. Could buy back all their shares and pay off debt in 5 years.
BUY

This is one of two oil large-caps he owns. CVE reported an inline quarter today, including taking a charge on the Keystone XL. At $60 oil, CVE is targeted at 19% free cash flow yield. They diluted some upside when they bought Husky Energy, but there are likely some assets in Husky to delever CVE. Large caps like this have really lagged the rise in oil prices but will bounce back. Doesn't know why it's getting pressured today, but he isn't worried. The merger with Husky means CVE is committed to paying down that debt, which he expects to reach a market average for debt by end of 2021.

DON'T BUY

HSE-T + CVE-T: Stay after the merger? He does not own either one. He understands the merger makes sense. There are a lot of cost savings that can be found. He prefers CNQ-T, PXT-T and one of his Top Picks today. He prefers these to HSE-T. If the sector bounces back you could get an uplift.

BUY ON WEAKNESS

He was not overly enthused by the Husky take over. He has warmed up to the outlook of the stock in a better oil price environment. At $50 oil, they do not compete as well as CNQ or SU. He has started to dip his toe into CVE. At $50 oil, they would be trading at a 24% free cashflow yield, which is compelling for a large cap stock.

COMMENT

It's fine but they have a lot of refining exposure where there is overcapacity. It's not terribly overbought like CNQ. There may be better areas to be invested. You probably want Canadian small-cap with some natural gas.

COMMENT

The unique thing is their cost profile -- it is very low compared to peers. The trouble for CVE is getting their production out of Canada. That is why he favours pipelines over producers. There is too much commodity price risk, so he would not be a buyer. You might want to consider EOG instead as they do not have pipeline constraints to worry about.

BUY ON WEAKNESS
Their balance isn't bad nor is their debt. Oil production is up, but they are vulnerable to lower oil prices. A WTI/WCS price pullback--which he expects--will push this stock back below $4. So, don't buy now. Long-term, this is better, or add on pullbacks. If you bought in March, you could so some trading.
DON'T BUY
A very levered play to oil. It has over $6.7 billion in liquidity. Their 2021 net-debt to cash flow is 24 times -- an accident waiting to happen. You need higher commodity prices for a some time to make this a good buy. He is not convinced energy prices are ready to get there just yet. He would not be buying now.
BUY ON WEAKNESS
He does not cover the company. The stock has recovered well. It is highly leveraged to oil prices, which he thinks are a little high right now (although he sees $40 in Q4 for WTI). It will probably retrace its price a little, perhaps below $4. Long term debt is $7.6 billion against $17 billion in equity, so the balance sheet is in good shape.
Showing 166 to 180 of 532 entries