Biotechs? A tough area. It has fundamental analysis, but also macro influences such as presidential elections, a lot of political commentary about drug prices, a Democratic presidential candidate who has a history of becoming involved in healthcare reform. A bit of a scary situation for potential investors. Have traded off to such an extent that some are quite attractive on a valuation basis and have some really fine growth characteristics. Biogen (BIIB-Q) and Celgene (CELG-Q) are good opportunities. He has stayed shy of the sector because of the macro influence of a potential democratic win.
Markets. Belgium, Germany, the budget. How will the news affect markets? Tragedies are unfortunate, but he is such a long term investor that it does not affect him. We have lived with terrorism all our lives. HBC has stores in Belgium and Germany. Companies with assets negatively affected in the long run, you have to take action. Real estate will be affected in Europe in specific areas from these events. Since 1987, he has been saying the volatility comes and goes. The federal budget: Effect on renewables: He has been a long term investor in this sector and not because of a particular platform being elected. The liberals want to spend a lot of money.
Markets. A big rise in the deficit and subsequent debt from the federal budget today. It has a lot of influence from economic advisors from Ontario. It is worrisome to him. We may be in low growth, but we are not in trouble. Going into debt the way we are is like we are in fact in trouble. There is no plan to ever pay it back. It will be interesting to see what happens to the Canadian dollar.
Where to put new money - Oil?. He identifies companies, not sectors. You should have a diversified portfolio, however. You have to diversify outside of Canada also. Oil stocks had a premature run, maybe short covering. Historically you don’t get ‘V’ shaped bottoms in commodities. Hold off in oils for the moment.
Canadian Banks. He only owns BNS-T because it is the most international with the smallest Canadian footprint. He sees a lot of headwinds such as the oil patch. You are only now getting people defaulting on debt due to the oil price problem. He prefers US banks where there is a more certain economy and loan growth. He sees Latin American and Asia as the future growth area for banks.
Educational Segment. Why Raising Retirement Age is a Good Idea. A Lawyer and an Actuary penned an article about why it was a bad idea to roll back OAS from 67 to 65. We are all living longer. OAS started in the 1950s and life expectancy was 80. Now if you live to 65 you are likely to live to 85. We will be at 16% young people going forward, but the number of old people will be going up dramatically (16-24%). Governments are inept at dealing with people living longer. The kids are going to pay. Each one owes $38k right now. The US will be out of OAS by 2039 if they don’t change policy.
Markets. It has been a tough 3 or 4 months. A neighbour of his was busy pouring cement for home builds until January and then it just stopped. He thinks this is as bad as it gets right now. In ‘08/09 when the Saudis cut production, Western Canada never laid off employees. Right now it seems like they are doing double the amount of layoffs they should have. April and May will be the inflection point with bankruptcies or acquisitions. You should find companies that trade with debt to cash flow of 3 or lower and cheap multiples are candidates. Acquirers will just get saddled with the debt of others. The market usually prices things in 6 months in advance.
Markets. Volatility ironically gives him opportunities. When you are in a one-way market, it takes everything with it, the good and the bad. That makes it difficult for people who want to distinguish between good companies and bad companies. Stock picking, after been out of favour a few years, has come back and allowed people to do well if they choose carefully. His philosophy and process is to always take money off the table when companies become overextended. If a company does everything well, the market loves it and drives it up to a valuation level where it hasn’t been before, and that is the risk. In that case, you just take a piece off. As an example, he has held Apple (AAPL-Q) for 11 years, but he has trimmed it 7 times. He would have been better, from a rewards standpoint, to have held it throughout that time, but from a risk adjusted basis, he would not have.