50% off Premium Yearly

To what extent does it suffer from a holding company type discount to the value of its assets? Is that discount stable relative to earnings growth and growth in the value of its assets and, in which case, does it really have an impact on the value as an investment? One of the largest asset managers in the country. Recently spun off their real estate holdings into Brookfield Property Partners (BPY-N). Brookfield Asset Management on its own does have a percentage of holdco discount. If you look towards the entities like BPY, the holdco discount is even larger. His choice is to owning this because as a holder, he is aligned with the management team 1 for 1. Going forward that is his preference in terms of ownership. This one has held up very well in terms of this downturn and is trading just slightly above its NAV.
(A Top Pick June 7/12. Up 4.5%.) He has had a lot of exposure for 3 years to real assets that generate cash flow. This one is a great example of that. He has been steadily moving his asset base from Canada to the US so he now owns more US real estate assets. However, this is still a very compelling investment.
Does the fact that this is a conglomerate affect how you would assess its value and prospects for growth? He has a NAV of $40 so it is trading at about an 8% discount. This company characterizes its future growth through what their NAV is. They say that over the next 9 years, there is going to be a big transfer away from bond yields and into real assets, which will drive their adjusted funds rate about 13% annualized over the next 9 years. There could be near-term weakness.
Asset management company in property, infrastructure and renewable energy. What is really key is that they are really great operators. They buy assets very well. Trades at a discount to its NAV. Nice dividend yield. A lot of infrastructure by governments will have to be sold off and this company is very good at buying these assets and running them.