
TSE:AX.UN
This summary was created by AI, based on 2 opinions in the last 12 months.
Experts have expressed strong concerns regarding Artis Real Estate Investment Trust (AX.UN-T), highlighting several issues that make it less attractive. The recent announcement indicates that the company will be sold at a significant 44% discount to its intrinsic value, raising alarms about its valuation. Additionally, the shift from monthly to quarterly distributions, coupled with a reduction in payout, is viewed negatively, suggesting potential liquidity issues and a lack of investor trust. Furthermore, the plan for privatization at zero premium and a temporary delisting has contributed to a grim outlook, with the market reacting unfavorably. Overall, the lack of institutional investment and sparse interest in better offers makes the future prospects appear bleak.
(A Top Pick April 4/13. Up 5.04%.) Continues to like. Doesn’t feel they have gotten enough credit with respect to what they have done to the balance sheet and payout ratio. Management unfortunately has been faced with a “we’ll wait and see” from most investors. They are now starting to come into the name. It will re-rate to a higher multiple from his perspective. About 20% invested in the US.
(Top Pick Jun 17/13, Up 5.55%) He was worried about the development of office properties in Calgary. This is one he thinks he should have bought back at the bottom. The US properties have performed very well. Concern in Calgary is that he is not sure if the oil companies will use all the office space being built.
High quality diversified REIT with a pretty good yield of 7.5%. Suffered with all the REITs since spring. Question is going to be what the cash flow is worth to people. Thinks the dividend is sustainable. Growth is going to be harder to find than it has been in the last 2 years. Had been trading at very high multiples that allowed them to buy properties, bring them in and get a lift.
Not one of her preferred REITs. Tended to grow somewhat aggressively without a huge view in terms of strategy of what markets and products they were in, in terms of property classes and quality of the assets.