
TSE:AX.UN
This summary was created by AI, based on 2 opinions in the last 12 months.
Artis Real Estate Investment Trust (AX.UN-T) has recently been subject to negative evaluations from experts, primarily due to its decision to go private at a zero premium. This move has led to significant concern in the market, reflected in its current trading at a hefty 44% discount to its perceived integral value. The distribution shift from monthly to quarterly payments, and a notable reduction in those payments, further exacerbates investor wariness. Additionally, with the underlying structure described as peculiar and the company categorized as small with limited institutional investment, the outlook appears bleak. Overall, experts express strong skepticism about its future prospects, indicating that investors should proceed with caution and consider avoiding this stock altogether.
(A Top Pick April 4/13. Up 5.04%.) Continues to like. Doesn’t feel they have gotten enough credit with respect to what they have done to the balance sheet and payout ratio. Management unfortunately has been faced with a “we’ll wait and see” from most investors. They are now starting to come into the name. It will re-rate to a higher multiple from his perspective. About 20% invested in the US.
(Top Pick Jun 17/13, Up 5.55%) He was worried about the development of office properties in Calgary. This is one he thinks he should have bought back at the bottom. The US properties have performed very well. Concern in Calgary is that he is not sure if the oil companies will use all the office space being built.
High quality diversified REIT with a pretty good yield of 7.5%. Suffered with all the REITs since spring. Question is going to be what the cash flow is worth to people. Thinks the dividend is sustainable. Growth is going to be harder to find than it has been in the last 2 years. Had been trading at very high multiples that allowed them to buy properties, bring them in and get a lift.
Not one of her preferred REITs. Tended to grow somewhat aggressively without a huge view in terms of strategy of what markets and products they were in, in terms of property classes and quality of the assets.