Birchcliff Energy Ltd. (BIR-T)

Looks as though it's trying to break out. Be aware that there was a false breakout earlier this year. So you really want to see the peak back in March or so taken out.

Bases are good, and they say that "the greater the base the better the case". Pretty good base here of a year or more; a breakout would be powerful on the stock. (But if it fails, can also be powerful to the downside.) If the breakout is for real this time, tons of upside. He loves base breakouts; he wrote a book called Sideways on that topic.

Natural gas utility. Price of nat gas is volatile, and he didn't like that they didn't hedge the price. Nat gas price rolled over, and large dividend had to be cut in March 2024. Dividend is now skinny, with a yield ~2%, a much better strategy.

It is suffering much more than energy stocks in general. If it breaks $6 then buy for a swing trade.

Likes the energy sector, this is a great name within it. Attractive valuation. If you believe in decent energy demand and oil prices moving higher, which he believes, a name to add to your portfolio. Yield is 6.5%.

If nat gas spikes to $5, this might give you a higher return. It's smaller than Compares to Tourmaline and Arc which have scale in their projects.

BIR beat estimates nicely across the board, with a very big beat on EBITDA at $132M. Average production was ahead of estimates at 78,358 b/d. Operationally, things look fine, but it did lower guidance on expected lower prices. Still, consensus calls for good growth overall in 2025. The balance sheet has some debt but is OK overall. The stock reacted well to the news, and we would be fine holding this for sector exposure. 
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free

Western Canadian oil and natural gas producer. Does not own shares. Not a good investment due to weak natural gas prices. 82% of production is natural gas which is not profitable at this time. If natural gas prices increase - would recommend Tourmaline. 

Owning a company that's more cyclical is not owned for the dividend yield. You can find 6-7% dividend yields on companies that aren't as volatile. This one is fine, but tied to underlying commodity prices. The group hasn't performed exceptionally well.

If he's correct, dividend was cut in half earlier this year, now yielding about 6.5%. On the high end for the industry, as capex takes a lot funding. Once cut, he assumes they won't cut again, at least not right away.

He's been buying other small nat gas names. Cut dividend, a good thing because they were using debt to fund it. Next year, payout ratio should drop to 73% with $4 gas, a lot more defendable. Concerns about debt, takeaway capacity, and CEO succession. Cleaner names elsewhere. Yield is 6.7%.

Good for TFSA. The company is on solid footing with the energy outlook positive for 2-3 years. Oil prices today are higher than last year's expectations. Also, we haven't seen the oil exploration which is normal for this part of the cycle. Be careful, given the emergence of EVs which is a long-term trend, though term there are question marks.

As part of Birchliff's orderly and planned leadership succession process, Jeff Tonken retired as CEO effective December 31, 2023, and Chris Carlsen is now the President and CEO. BIR has $244M in net debt, representing a small 0.9X net debt/EBITDA ratio and 0.15 debt/equity ratio. A rough estimation of ~$55M in quarterly cash from operations and ~$50M in CAPEX, along with ~$55M in quarterly dividends, equates to approximately $50M of debt issued each quarter to service its current dividend. It is tough to gauge exactly what the company might do if gas prices remain at these levels, but we feel the company is less likely to cut the dividend than it is to issue debt or equity to fund the dividends. At its currently low debt levels, we believe the company will likely continue increasing its debt to fund its yield.
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free

His numbers show burning $25M of debt to satisfy dividend next year. US nat gas supply's at all-time high. Won't cut dividend, unless gas price goes down materially due to a warm winter. Strong balance sheet. Trades at a premium. 13% downside from here. Yields almost 12%.

Negative momentum would be the main issue holding us back right now. It is down 18% in November alone, and with the 3Q 'miss' and the big negative shift in the energy sector, it is hard to step in aggressively without at least some stabilization. BIR is down 34% this year, and could also still see a bit more tax loss selling. A shift in momentum is never easy to time perfectly, but in this case we would be more willing to pay a bit more if the stock price can at least stabilize for a period of time. Without this, we would be OK with a slow beginning accumulation of stock if it moves close to the low $6 level.
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free

The update was slightly negative as free cash flow missed estimates. Earnings did as well. Spending was 'slightly higher' which also added to debt. EPS was 6c vs 9c expected. Cash flow was $71.4M vs estimates $85.6M. Production fell 5% to 74,143 b/d. Per share cash flow was 27c vs $1.01 last year. Capex was $67.5M. Production was in line with estimates. 12-month payout ratio is still below 50% on operating cash flow. Consider strong growth is still expected in 2024, the stock's decline seems a bit harsh to us. The balance sheet also remains in excellent shape. 
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free