Healthcare through an ETF? Healthcare fits in with his theme of a post crisis financial environment. After a financial crisis, all industries that tend to be inventive or creative, tend to do incredibly well. That would apply to technology and healthcare. Biotech valuations have come down a little within the healthcare ETF’s due to Hillary Clinton’s policies. Feels healthcare in general is a good overweight. It is aligned with aging demographics and the post crisis financial environment. He likes the area in general and is overweight it in client’s portfolios.
US infrastructure ETF’s? This is difficult, because a lot of these tend to be a little mislabelled in the sense that they tend to be utility plays. He is working on the thesis of “Where is this money going to be spent?” if “helicopter money” is going to be initiated. He has yet to find a good infrastructure ETF.
A green or socially responsible ETF? There have been a number of countries that have signed on to the Paris Accord to limit carbon emissions by 2020. If you look over the last couple of years, any green ETF has been very disappointing. There are going to be bright spots in the future. One of the industries he feels would be ripe for an investment at some point, will be solar. It is going through a consolidation, and they have to get the demand up. The way to do that is to lower the cost of solar panels, which is exactly what has happened.
Market. When the Fed raises interest rates, he doesn’t believe they’re going to do it at each of the next few meetings i.e. in a fast cycle. Rate increases are likely to be gradual because there is still subpar economic growth in the US and in other regions. If they hike rates too aggressively, you would see financial conditions tighten. We are in a low yield environment, and people have gravitated to dividend stocks in search of better yields, and if you look at certain sectors, there is certainly a risk that there could be a rotation out of so-called defensive and expensive dividend paying sectors. What he tries to do is to identify companies that have a very sustainable free cash flow yield that are generating a lot of money with clean balance sheets.
Markets. Credit is becoming a major threat in China. This has been a major risk for years. 100% of the growth in China has been fueled by debt since the Lehman moment. You see an increase globally in defaults in debts since 2015. There is a warning signal here. Trump is picking up inch by inch. He has a reasonable chance here.
Educational Segment. The market thinks the likelihood is 18% for a rate hike. He thinks they will go for it this week, however. They have not unexpectedly raised rates since 1994. ’94 was the worse bond market we had for a generation. This will not be similar. It is all about the psychology of how they do it. We will almost certainly get another recession in the next couple of years and Canada and the US will have to go to negative interest rates. Economic numbers are getting worse, but the market has not reacted.
Markets. Investors have been moving into economically sensitive sectors since Brexit. We are seeing signs that US profits are actually going to turn positive after a number of quarters of negative earnings growth. We are finally going to see earnings growth year over year. Stocks are not cheap right now. Interest rates are starting to move up around the world. The negative yields have started to lift and certain areas are starting to turn positive. The market moves ferociously to talk of a quarter point move in interest rates.
Emerging Markets. These have been trod on for the last 4 years, and investors have definitely been sour on that class. He tends to like the commodity importing countries such as India and China. Looking at the history of emerging markets, they tend to have big booms or big busts, either hot or they are not. Thinks emerging markets have bottomed and are tending to be a bit more resilient than developed markets.