50% off Premium Yearly
Comparing BAM to BN in general, the parent BN is probably the better way to go. But the dividend is important as part of the total return.
When you look at the Brookfield universe, BEP.UN gives you about a 5% yield. The yield from BIP.UN is a bit more than that. There are times you do want to own the satellites.
For all the Canadian banks, expects this quarter to be very constructive. Upside to margins, even with lower loan volumes. Credit losses remain manageable. Typical PE for banks was 10-12x, now 13-14x -- investors are getting comfortable with that shift, but there could be some fickleness there.
Need to draw a distinction between Canadian oil stocks and the rest of the world. Canadian oil stocks should outperform, due to years of underdevelopment and now we're getting resources off shore and our differentials are narrowing. All great.
Energy's benefited from the "everything else" trade. Also a pop from possible conflict with Iran. Expects oil prices longer-term to have a hard time in 2027-2028. He'd be fading the rally.
He'd be buying nat gas stocks, such as TOU.
Midterm elections are coming up, and those typically introduce a lot of policy uncertainty.
Continued overhang of capex in AI and data centres among the hyperscalers -- this year it's going to be show me the ROI (return on investment). They'll need to show how they're turning investment dollars into revenue.
His firm is being fairly patient. When you look at what the capex was last year, it was around $440B. When they reported Q4, the numbers have come up dramatically. Projections are for $750B for 2026, and $900B for 2027. Some of them have over $1T as we approach 2030.
Those capex numbers have to translate into profits for the hyperscalers. Typically, hyperscalers would show 2-3 times their capex in terms of profits over the next several years.
If we look at current estimates for profitability for these companies, they have to come up dramatically to support the ROI expected from the capex spend.
People are moving from the speculative hype of last year toward measurable productivity. Generative AI will have more to do with cost efficiency and margin expansion than with pure revenue growth.
In the news over the last month or so we've seen how the productivity of companies and professionals (lawyers, accountants) is benefiting dramatically from using these tools.
Microsoft, Amazon, Netflix and other tech names are getting rotated out and into defensive stocks, like value and dividend stocks. Also are seeing flows out of the US and into Canada. She's nervous about the markets, but less so about the Canadian. Valuations are historically high in energy, but where else can you put your money? The energy trade isn't over yet (i.e. Enbridge). Gold is the flight to safety, but how safe is it when multiples are this high? She likes Canadian banks, but have moved up so sharply the past year so won't buy them short term, but likes them long.
Three underpinnings are quite supportive of the outlook for the year.
Economic backdrop -- global growth trend for 2026 and into 2027 is relatively healthy. Global economy expected to grow at a faster clip than over the past 3 years. Canada's economy is accelerating closer to its historical pace. On the macro side, employment and inflation are supportive.
Corporate fundamentals -- across the US, the eurozone, and Japan have been coming in well above expectations. Guidance for the remainder of the year has been very strong.
Markets -- broadening out.
In the US, there's a one-time tax break coming around April that will provide a boost.
For the Canadian consumer, we're seeing about 100 bps of interest rate easing and downward momentum in terms of inflation. That will benefit the Canadian consumer, as will some of the spillover effect from fiscal announcements.
The key thing to know is that the effect of monetary policy is immediate (floating rate mortgage, line of credit, etc.). However, it's imprecise.
Fiscal policy is very precise, but it makes its way into the real economy at a much slower pace. It can have a lower material impact over a longer period of time. Think defense spending, housing, key federal projects, support for the auto sector. These will be tailwinds for the consumer in the years to come.
Hard to tell if they're overspending. What he can say is that their history of deploying capital can help us decide. Early days, and general consensus is that it's a bit of sticker shock.
MSFT, for example, is expected to spend ~$130B over the next 12 months. He looks at their capital allocation decisions of the past compared to generated returns. Majority of the Mag 7's have generated upwards of 20-30% ROIC.
For those of the Mag 7 that have reported, he's seen strong underlying trends such as strong corporate demand and business fundamentals that support the buildout and justify the spending.
Demand is high, and it's being driven by a lot of consumer and real-time usage of AI across the global ecosystem. Strong demand, and he sees strong visibility to monetization efforts. Won't happen overnight, but tidbits of numbers here and there support the long-range view.