TSE:IMO

Imperial Oil (IMO.TO)

169.62
-6.61 (3.75%)
as of Jun 5, 2026, 8:00:00 pm Market Open.
241 watching
0
Investor Insights
star iconJun 5, 2026, 12:00 am

This summary was created by AI, based on 17 opinions in the last 12 months.

Imperial Oil (IMO) has garnered attention from various experts, with many viewing it as a strong investment opportunity fueled by a favorable outlook on oil prices and robust fundamentals. Several analysts highlighted its excellent cash generation capability, low debt levels, and impressive dividend growth. While some expressed concerns about current valuations, noting that the stock is trading at a premium compared to peers, many agree that its long-term prospects remain compelling. The company's large inventory depth and shareholder returns strategy are significant positives, and it continues to be a standout performer amidst the broader oil and gas sector. Discussions indicate that despite some volatility in oil prices and external geopolitical factors, the sentiment toward Imperial Oil remains generally positive, particularly for long-term investors.

consensus icon
Consensus
Positive
valuation icon
Valuation
Overvalued
review icon
Similar
CVE
premiumPremium content

Unlock this Panic-proof Portfolio opinion with Stockchase Premium

Curated by Michael O'Reilly since 2020.
1550+ opinions with 4.81 rating (one of the best performing expert).

PAST TOP PICK
(A Top Pick Apr 17/25, Up 27.2%)Stockchase Research Editor: Michael O'Reilly

Our PAST TOP PICK with IMO is progressing well.  To remain disciplined, we recommend trailing up the stop (from $84) to $94 at this time.

PAST TOP PICK
(A Top Pick Apr 03/24, Up 10%)

Basic premise is that Canadian oil companies have unbelievable assets. Well north of 20% dividend growth. Great cashflow and shareholder returns. Oil's just broken a triple top on a point-and-figure chart, and these companies look as though they're about to reaccelerate. 

He'd buy this one, and he'd buy CNQ.

PAST TOP PICK
(A Top Pick Mar 12/25, Up 2%)

(Note the short timeframe.)  This is a swing trade. Looking at the chart, you can see how the stock likes to go down to $90-ish, and then go up to $100-ish. That's 10% that you can trade and trade. He always buys on the bounce.

He feels that all oil will break out eventually. He's hoping to get $100 on this, though it's pulled back a bit. If it gets there, he'll probably sell and then get back in if it returns to the bottom. If it doesn't, his buy price was close to the bottom so he isn't losing anything.

DON'T BUY

This trades at a massive premium, which he doesn't understand. IMO is not attractive in terms of price-cash flow, dividend or free cash-flow yield. Look at Athabasca instead (see his comments).

premiumPremium content

Unlock this Panic-proof Portfolio opinion with Stockchase Premium

Curated by Michael O'Reilly since 2020.
1550+ opinions with 4.81 rating (one of the best performing expert).

PAST TOP PICK
(A Top Pick Apr 17/25, Up 16.5%)Stockchase Research Editor: Michael O'Reilly

Our PAST TOP PICK with IMO has achieved its target at $103.  To remain disciplined, we recommend covering half the position at this time and trailing up the stop (from $67) to $84.

premiumPremium content

Unlock this Panic-proof Portfolio opinion with Stockchase Premium

Curated by Michael O'Reilly since 2020.
1550+ opinions with 4.81 rating (one of the best performing expert).

TOP PICK
Stockchase Research Editor: Michael O'Reilly

Markets have factored in lower oil prices into the share price, but as the company is also a refiner, its downstream segment will benefit from lower feedstock costs.  It trades at 12x earnings, under 2x book and supports a ROE of 21%.  The company will announce latest financial results today -- we'll see if they are able to continue growing cash reserves.  We recommend setting a stop-loss at $67, looking to achieve $103 -- upside potential of 16%.  Yield 2.9%

SELL

Performed very well. Aggressively buying back stock. Trades at a deserved premium. But today he'd prefer CNQ. Good tax-loss candidate. Very strong balance sheet. FCF today is not what it was.

TOP PICK

Bought this around $92 with proceeds from CNQ. Attracted to the chart. A swing chart, easy to trade. Hopes it'll go to at least $105 or so, which is when he'd probably sell. Yield is 3%.

(Analysts’ price target is $104.56)
TOP PICK

Sideways trading range. Reported earnings today. Should not be affected as much by potential US tariffs, as energy may be exempt. Boring, blue chip. He likes energy, and this is a way to play. Yield is 2.9%.

(Analysts’ price target is $104.28)
WEAK BUY

Good business. Alberta oil sands are low cost, long life, low decline. Refineries. Integrated, with benefit being that it takes the raw edge off commodity price sensitivity. Owns this indirectly through the back door, with an investment in XOM (major shareholder of IMO).

Modestly bullish on oil. Not his first choice, but no quarrels with it either.

BUY

The ZEO ETF recently broke out to new highs. In the group, he likes CNQ, IMO and SU.

WEAK BUY

Oil prices weak recently, generally gets a little firmer coming into winter. Lots of Middle East conflict. US energy producers in general have performed much worse than Canadian, partly because of debate on whether shale can sustain production. 

Longer term, the sector is attractive and these companies will generate a ton of cash and strong dividend growth. Near-term technical questions. He'd love to see price of oil stabilize. It has in last couple of days, but that's geopolitically driven.

DON'T BUY

Very well run company. Trading at premium to other energy companies. Safe company with excellent inventory. However, better options out there for investors. 

TOP PICK

Rock-solid balance sheet. Great long-life assets. Operational excellence. Cashflow-generating machine. Bought back 1/3 of company's shares in last 7-8 years; that will continue. 5-year dividend growth rate is 23% a year. Pricing power. A company that will offset inflation. Yield is 2.5%.

(Analysts’ price target is $102.21)
DON'T BUY
Caller's first job was mowing grass in the 1970s at an Esso tank farm (they paid for his university education), and he still holds the shares.

The old Esso. Great company, but better names to own going forward. If an investor has owned since the 1970s, they've done really well but probably sitting on a heck of a tax liability.

Showing 16 to 30 of 377 entries