Lockheed Martin (LMT-N)

There used to be 51 defence contractors, but after merging there are now only five major companies. Rather than innovative, these companies are gaming government contracts. Trump appointed Elon Musk to the new Efficency Dept. and Musk openly criticized Lockheed Martin's F-35's design and should be replaced by drones. However the LMT CEO responded that enemies use fancy fighter jets of their own, and Israel recently effectively used F-35s against Iran. Musk's criticism have put the defence industry under a microscope, an industry that has always been sacrosanct. Nobody wants to be accused of being weak on defence. LMT is -14.77% since Trump was elected. Barclays just stated that defence remains difficult with more budget risk than thought, given Musk. For pure defense stocks, wait and see. This sector is untouchable.

Problem is these defense companies make too much company and the taxpayers doesn't get their bang for their buck. Shares have come down nicely to a buy level. It yields only 2.7%.

Doesn't see anyone killing the F-35 program.

He hates to say this, but the world will remain a violent place. 

He bought it because he wanted defence exposure. Unfortunately, the world will demand defense (Middle East, Ukraine, BRIC). LMT's order book for fighter jets is strong. He bought a small position, because the valuation is high--he bit the bullet. He will add on weakness. Their last report showed signs of life in the margins, now that supply chain problems are gone.

Has done well. Good backlog of contracts. Leader. Lots of innovation. Earnings growth in next little while might be a bit weaker. 22x forward earnings. Outcome of US election might sway strength of the stock one way or another. Bit expensive.

A reasonable defensive company given world tensions. This will help their order book as defense budgets climb. Trades at a low 17x PE. A decent stock. He prefers RTX, because it also has an aerospace business in addition to defence, which is a hedge.

The stock has been a dog, BUT pays a 3% dividend and run by a decent CEO.

Q4 EPS and revenue beat estimates but revenue declined by 0.6% year-over-year which was cause for concern and provides reasoning to LMT's pullback. There is definitely increased demand for defense contractors which should benefit LMT in the future, however the decline in sales offset that sentiment. Forecasts suggest modest revenue and EPS growth next year. We think despite the drop in revenue in Q4, LMT should continue to perform steadily, and looks to be good value with forward price-to-earnings ratio now coming down to 16.4x. 
Unlock Premium - Try 5i Free

Demand for products not going away (defense spending) with global tensions and war. Excellent brand name. Would recommend holding shares. R&D very strong at company. Good for long term investors. 

Geopolitics now will encourage governments to spend more on defence. The Ukraine war has persistent so long that there will need to be rebuilding of weapons stockpiles. That could make LMT interesting to own, and the market could allow a higher PE.

He just sold it, stopped out. Their price action was horrible. If their is increase in demand spending, it will take a long time to reach the bottom line of LMT.

Shows a downward, mediocre trend, unable to hold previous highs. It popped yesterday on the Israel-Hamas news and this could push it up further, but he's skeptical about the chart

Run by a good CEO, but shares are down because the market expects Washington to spend less on defence. A well-run company and shares are cheap.

Would wait to buy shares.
Quality company - but trading expensive.
Demand for defense products not going away.
Better names to invest in - prefers Raytheon.
Defensive name for investors.