50% off Premium Yearly

TSE:CCA
This summary was created by AI, based on 5 opinions in the last 12 months.
Cogeco Communications (CCA-T) operates in a challenging Canadian telecommunications market characterized by lower population growth and rising inflation. Experts express mixed feelings, noting that while CCA presents a cheaper option with a strong dividend yield, the overall sentiment towards telecom stocks remains under pressure due to limited pricing power. The competitive landscape is highlighted, particularly with the threat from emerging providers like Starlink and ongoing competition in the cable and fiber sectors, especially in the United States. Despite these challenges, CCA is favored for its dividend growth that outpaces many of its peers, along with a positive technical outlook suggesting potential upside. Ultimately, while the general consensus leans towards caution regarding the telecom sector, CCA is seen as a reasonable choice for income-focused investors.
Still adding new money. He uses a name like this to offset higher beta/risk names like CSU and BN in client TFSAs. Due to price competition, telcos haven't grown. Being further tested due to less immigration. Flipside is that a 6-7% yield and a 2-3% price gain would give you a 10% total return.
Problem is all the leverage taken on to build out 5G, but not getting an economic return from it. Because CCA could hop on the fibre network paid for by others, its stock price has gone up, while the others have gone down.
He bought it for the dividend, which grows 10% annually. All the telcos are down because they've had to borrow to upgrade to 5G, and rates have been high. Especially if rates decline, a lot of their debt will fall in the next 2 years and this oligopoly will enjoy profitablility.
Uncertain future, with RCI.B divesting its stake. Tough times with US broadband. Rogers is now in their backyard and ready to compete. Question marks, reflected in the share price. Won't see big dividend growth. Will investing in wireless give them more earnings? Wait a couple of quarters. Yield is 5.6%.
Pays a 6.3% dividend that's growing 10% annually vs. other telcos at 5%. CCA generates better cash flow. The knock is that CCA deals a lot in the US where consumers hop from one carrier to another in search of cheaper phone deals. They're gaining some market share in the US to compete with AT&T and Verizon.
(Analysts’ price target is $71.30)The US was a growth driver for them, but are facing more competition there. US telcos are falling as a whole. Also, in Canada there could be the launch of a wireless service without launching a network. And Rogers owns a big stake in CCA, so will Rogers delever following the Shaw deal? These are three overhands that have pressured shares. He prefers CCA's larger peers. Also, telecoms remain weakness.
Cogeco Communications is a Canadian stock, trading under the symbol CCA.TO (previously CCA-T on Stockchase) on the Toronto Stock Exchange (CCA-CT). It is usually referred to as TSX:CCA or CCA.TO
In the last year, 5 stock analysts published opinions about CCA.TO (previously CCA-T on Stockchase). 2 analysts recommended to BUY the stock. 2 analysts recommended to SELL the stock. The latest stock analyst recommendation is DON'T BUY. Read the latest stock experts' ratings for Cogeco Communications.
Cogeco Communications was recommended as a Top Pick by Ryan Bushell on 2023-07-18. Read the latest stock experts ratings for Cogeco Communications.
Earnings reports or recent company news can cause the stock price to drop. Read stock experts' recommendations for help on deciding if you should buy, sell or hold the stock.
5 stock analysts on Stockchase covered Cogeco Communications in the last year. It is a trending stock that is worth watching.
On 2026-06-11, Cogeco Communications (CCA.TO) stock closed at a price of $66.37.
Canadian telcos are a tough space due to lower population growth, less immigration and rising inflation. All telcos are stuck. CCA is cheap and pays a dividend, so it won't hurt a portfolio much. He prefers Rogers or Quebecor, though.