A Comment -- General Comments From an Expert (A Commentary)

Generally speaking, sees global GDP growth being solid for the year. Advanced countries being a little bit stronger than developing countries. 

Inflation's moderating, as we saw today with the CPI number being a little less than expected. The first decline since May 2020, so that's good news and should lead to lower interest rates. Of course, we already saw the BOC and ECB cut rates last month. Should see some rate cutting in the US at some point this year.

If you have a 60% or 80% weighting in tech, that may not be the most appropriate weighting depending on your time horizon. Tech is expensive by a lot of degrees, so you want to look at other sectors whether financials, industrials, or healthcare. There are a lot of other growth stories out there, outside of tech.

From a taxation standpoint in a non-registered portfolio, it lets you defer capital gains via a return of capital. These types of strategies are quite efficient, as you're getting dividends as well as deferred capital gains instead of interest.

We look at technology and say, oh, tech is x% of the S&P 500. But then you have to add in the communications sector as well, which is mostly technology. Then you add in things like BRK, which people don't think of as technology, but half of it or more is AAPL. So the "true" weighting of tech in the S&P is actually closer to 40-45%.

For him, once a position gets to 5-7% (most likely 5.5-6%), he's going to rebalance downwards. Just to trim a bit and take a bit of risk off the table.

They should track pretty closely. The idea is that you get US stocks in Canadian dollars. Also beneficial for estate planning for very large, high net worth investors to avoid some US estate taxes.

He's not aware of one with just telecoms. You'd usually get the communications sector added in, with the likes of META, etc. But the ETF world is expanding by the minute every day, so you never know.

For both US and Canadian telcos, as interest rates moved higher, dividend yields looked less and less attractive to investors. So rising rates have hurt a lot of dividend-paying companies.

Not high growth, you won't see 15-20% EPS going forward.

Neutral on the sector. Long term, makes sense. But right now, much of the attention is on technology and high growth. The energy sector is neither of those things. Might start to perform well once the focus shifts.

When you look at the S&P 500, recall that it is a market-weighted index. So larger companies are going to push the index more, and that's what we've seen this year and last. S&P 500 is up 18% YTD, but up only 9% if you take out the Magnificent 7. The top 10 names take up 30% or so of the S&P index. 

Should you own that type of index at this point? Who knows how long that momentum will go? It is expensive because of the tech weighting. So he prefers equal weight, factor strategies, or picking individual names.

People need a reality check. His fund is up just under 20% right now, almost quadrupling the broader TSX, and almost matching NASDAQ. Energy stocks are working and winning. For global oil inventories, the deficit to normal levels just hit an all-time low, which means bullish for price, continuing through this year. Demand is beating bearish expectations. 

People don't appreciate how unbelievably profitable companies are today, and how much free cashflow is being generated. Oil is at $83 right now. We don't need the oil price to go up any further from here for these companies and stocks to do spectacularly well.

The path for stocks to continue to do well relies on buybacks. We're seeing record share buybacks. Seems to be skepticism around this. Most companies have a very heavy spend at the beginning of the year. In Q2, 3 and 4, they harvest that free cashflow, and that's what we're seeing. Take BTE, which he thinks can buy back 10% of stock outstanding over the next 6 months using just half of its free cashflow. There are multiple examples of that.

He remains bullish on oil, likely to be at $80 oil on average through 2025, and triple digits beyond that. An environment that's stronger than what consensus believes. OPEC should be able to return all its discretionary barrels to market, which can reabsorb them, despite mediocre demand growth forecast for 2025, and without being price disruptive.

The sector's trading at a 14% free cashflow yield, and most companies are giving all of that, or most of it, back to shareholders in the form of buybacks. The ongoing buyback of shares and retiring them will eventually force share prices to go up. Balance sheets have never been stronger, free cashflow never higher.

The generalist investor is waking up, very slowly, to the attraction of the energy sector. We're still in an environment where people buy into the false narrative that we're in this rapid transition. The whole narrative is crumbling before our eyes. Look at Volkswagen this morning saying it might have to shut a factory due to slowing demand for EVs. A McKinsey report said that half of Americans who bought an EV are going to go back to gasoline next purchase.

No. He deployed his cash quite a while ago, anticipating a selloff. He's down to 2% cash as of this morning (maintained for any client redemptions). So he is, essentially, fully invested.

Biggest metric he looks at is free cashflow yield at $80 oil, $4 natural gas, $12.50 WCS differential in 2025. He then looks at how many years of inventory a company has. What are other catalysts? 

Then look at what the target free cashflow yield should be, and this is tough to figure out. In the past, he'd have said 10%, but US companies are trading at 6-8%, and Canadian companies are better. Shale companies are challenged, and this is becoming more obvious. He thinks Canadian companies will trade at a premium to US companies. So now he thinks an 8% free cashflow yield, getting it back via buybacks or dividends.

Then he can get a theoretical target price on every company he models.

Right now, he's very bullish on oil, especially heavy oil. Bullish, long-term, on natural gas. Quite bullish on services, especially drillers.