Stock price when the opinion was issued
Not really, because the US is concerned about semiconductors and chips. US government now owns an estimated 5%. This injection ensures that the company will survive. Not the best, most powerful, AI chips (that's NVDA). Depends if you think new CEO can turn things around. Now has to execute.
If you think NVDA's growth can keep up, that's a name to look at as well.
This investor sounds just like him. Sold out of his fund, but still in separately managed accounts.
Everyone's interested in it. The foundries require so much capex, and that's why there aren't that many. Fantastic company, but execution has been problematic. New CEO doing fabulous job. Getting pretty close to average analyst price target. Buy if you can see it down at $33, and certainly under $30.
No need to go there. Lots of positive news around the name, but it's really just geographic positioning. Floundering, and government buy-in came at the right time -- pure luck. They care in the US, because they want it to be a US manufacturer of chips. NVDA took its crown.
Instead, look at TSM or ASML or NVDA.
Controversial among his research team, but he's not a fan. Eventually, it will take off. Highest-paid CEO in the semiconductor business, but the worst-performing stock. 12-month price target of $41.15. Plays directly in the sandbox of NVDA and AMD. Results missed, guided lower. Price action tells you not to own.