Stock price when the opinion was issued
Both hold financials,but ZWB uses covered calls. HMAX has performed a little better and offers a little more yield. ZWB writes only half the securities, so it takes in less yield, but gets more upside capture. The price return is 11% on ZWB in the past year vs. HMAX's 6%, but the total return is close. However, ZWB pays you you more of a yield. nearly 7%, but gives less growth.
Caught a lot of attention from DIY investors who are sorting by yield. Has amongst the highest yields ever seen, ~14-15%. When you see a double-digit yield, ask where it's coming from. Here, it's through very aggressive covered call writing. Gives you high yield today, but very little growth going forward; a tradeoff. Looking at total return over the long term, almost always underperform ETFs that don't use covered calls.
Best way to use this one is in concert with other forms of investment that will participate in a market rise, such as ZEB.
Important point that yield does not equal total return. 70% exposure to the big 6 banks with an option overlay. Covered calls work best in sideways to slightly up/slightly down markets. Sacrifices upside. Up 23% over last 12 months, including dividends.
But what was the cost of writing those options? ZEB, BMO's equal weight bank ETF, is up 33%. That's 10% upside given away because of the way call-writing works (get income today, but give away upside).
Not really for growth-focused investors, more for income investors. One strategy would be to hold some of this, but blend it with an ETF that doesn't write calls.