Andy NasrA Comment -- General Comments From an ExpertA CommentaryN/ANov 14, 2013

The U.S. PCE number will be released on Wednesday. The Fed pays more attention to this than CPI, because PCE better tracks what consumers spend. Recent months have sent mixed messages with higher oil prices, then settlement, then rises again. Friday, we see the labour number. Lots to chew on. More important is earnings season in October. Expectations remain high for earnings growth, but he's concerned with what's happening beneath the surface. Is a little worried about rising yields; the cost financing the U.S. debt is getting out of control. Nov. 5 is the next quarterly re-funding announcement--how the treasury finances the debt. Congress needs to send less, and the Congress could change after the Midterms and result in gridlock.

The percentage of stocks above their 200-day average. The S&P is well above its 200-day, especially now, but the percentage of stocks that are above fell sharply last week. Now, more stocks than not are breaking their long-term trend. This is called a decay in market breadth and is a leading indicator. As it decays, eventually the top is formed. Another chart shows the number of stocks making new 52-week highs and lows. In the last 2 weeks, we saw a serious decay where the market is grinding higher to make new highs, but fewer stocks are participating. The warning signs are there, so maybe rebalance or take some profits, but don't sell a lot. Markets can still go higher for a while.

Interest rates are probably top of mind for most investors, and something his team is watching. Not only the level of rates, but also the 10-year to 2-year spread. The spread has been compressing recently and moving toward zero. It's always something to be aware of, as it means that the market thinks economic activity could potential be slowing into 2027.

Everyone's watching oil prices, which have a big impact on inflation.

It's anyone's guess. If we were to see some type of resolution, he'd think the price would go down. Does it go back to previous levels? No, because damage has taken a fair bit of production offline, and it'll take a significant amount of time to come back on.

Even if we saw peace tomorrow, we'd probably see something in the $70-80 range. Without a declaration of peace, and compliance on that peace, he sees it above $80.

For every $1 that a barrel of oil moves up or down, it equates to around 3 bps of inflation in the US. If we were to see it move down from here, you could see inflation starting to tick down; if it goes up, inflation moves the other way.

The thing to focus on, heading into the first part of 2027, is that we're going to see higher numbers on the previous year's inflation rolling off. So we should start to see inflation trickling down. Unless we see another dramatic move up in inflation from where it is right now.

They certainly have an impact. But the market is heading into what tends to be the best time in the 4-year cycle. Just before midterms (end of October), and all the way through to the next presidential election, is the strongest period in the market cycle. Next year would actually be the strongest year of that cycle.

We're going through weakness right now (last half of September to the first part of October) where the market tends to be the most weak in a presidential cycle. After that it starts to accelerate.

If everything went completely wrong, markets would probably still go up. That seems to be what's happening anyway. He was sure (as sure as God made little green apples), with the new US Fed chair as Trump's boy, that there was no way they were going to raise interest rates before the midterm elections. They did. 

And the market hit new highs.

Yes, US earnings have been robust. Despite all evidence to the contrary, there's evidence of tremendous optimism still out there in the market. You can say it's because there's nowhere else for people to put their cash, or because of the greater fool theory, or because (in real terms) interest rates are still quite low. (The stated interest rate is 3% or so, but he doesn't know of anything that's gone up only 3% in the last year.) 

There's a lot going on out there psychologically that we don't understand. It's also possible that it's just AI and the first step toward singularity.

It's already catching up. Look at today's news surrounding ORCL and pipeline delays. Energy is an input, and there's a cost to running all of this technology. There are a lot of challenges around energy.

There's a lot of demand for energy that's not going to stop. So the price of energy will continue to be robust, which won't necessarily be a terrible thing for Canada.

He's looking for companies that are able to raise their prices, and that have control over their own markets to a much greater degree. It'll be interesting to see what happens with the banks, Canadian ones in particular, which had a huge run earlier this year.

With this rising interest rate environment, it could be a good thing for the banks. They've done very well in a low-interest rate environment. Typically, falling rates are better for banks. It'll be interesting to see how the financial services sector does from here.

These partnerships can be a good thing. When a big company gets embroiled with an even bigger company, he wonders about the possibility that the smaller company will be taken over. The partnership could last forever. Or the bigger company could just take the technology and run with it, and that would be his concern.

His concern is what if one of those legs gives out? When he hears about the supposed strength of the super-powerful US economy, he thinks AI spending alone accounts for about 50% of the growth over the past year. When you look back at the tech bubble, tech accounted for about 30% of the growth in the US economy. So AI is much bigger.

The rest has been the wealth effect from the higher-end cohort. Their spending has been more reflected in areas such as travel and concerts. But the remainder of consumers in the economy have faced higher food and gasoline costs. That segment isn't as robust -- look at results from WMT, HD, and others.

When you're really riding hard on this AI spending, the stock market continues its wealth effect, and higher-end spending continues. Lose any one of those and you're left with a pretty sloppy economy.

His firm has been getting more defensive in their holdings. Thinks that, ultimately, the move in interest rates will be down. Inflation will come under control, and we're not going to see the strength continuing in these rates.

He sold all his banks stocks on high valuation. He'd rather move into other areas that are unloved, out of favour, and where valuations are better.

For this next phase going forward, you have to look for who's going to monetize AI the best? The major cloud players (MSFT, AMZN, GOOG) are growing 40-50% plus. They're monetizing better than anybody else. 

When you look at AI spending and the capex (increasing every year and forecast to go to $1T next year), he's not sure it necessarily continues at that rate. There are a couple of problems. The big spenders are suddenly FCF-negative. They don't have as much money, and they're borrowing at a higher rate. To the degree you slow that down, that's the biggest leg of that 2-legged stool he talked about earlier. 

There's a lot of air underneath all these valuations. 

It was completely on the valuation. He's more trade-oriented, so he can move in and out of positions. 

Valuations on Canadian banks are at unsustainably high levels, now around 15+x PE compared to historical levels of 10-11x. A lot of the growth in earnings has been strong. But it's been driven by capital markets, trading activity, and wealth management -- all things that are tied to a strong stock market continuing. Yields aren't that attractive right now.

It's all tied to that 2-legged stool. Continued AI spending leads to a strong stock market. To the degree you don't sustain that, you're not going to get the higher multiples and you're not going to get the same level of earnings growth.