A Comment -- General Comments From an Expert (A Commentary)

COMMENT
Earnings.

Looking pretty good so far. In US, pretty much through earnings season; in Canada, we're about halfway. This quarter's been coming in line, maybe a bit better. 

Though always cautious, management outlooks have also been pretty positive. Usually Q1 guidance tends to be a bit more conservative, as management doesn't know how the rest of the year is going to unfold.

COMMENT
Tariffs.

The changes add to volatility. By now, everyone had accepted the tariffs and made adjustments. But then recent changes add to uncertainty. Probably still net-better for companies and markets with recent tariff formats that are being rolled out.

Over time, will support earnings more than the initial framework suggested.

COMMENT
Sectors to buy with Iran selloff.

Even with the selloff, US markets are still hanging around their highs. The TSX has been weaker, but a lot has been driven by materials.

Investors are probably a little antsy due to volatility, but in a diversified portfolio you're probably doing OK overall.

Software's seen a drawdown of 40% peak to trough in a lot of names. AI trend is still really interesting -- markets are so skittish on any headline that individual names can be quite volatile, which can present opportunities for nimble investors. You have to pick your spots.

COMMENT
Waning brand loyalty.

With social media, it's become a lot easier to build a niche product. So big brands like Nike, which previously had customer loyalty, can find segments of their product line effectively targeted by upstarts. It's almost a "death by 1000 cuts" scenario.

COMMENT
Software sector and AI.

A re-rating has been justified. But for the last 3 years it seems as though everyone heads to one side of the ship, and then they all head to the other side. Selling seems a bit overblown.

People worry about AI making things more competitive, but software's always been competitive. A low-moat business, easy for startups. Which has made it important for software companies to grow quickly and build scale.

It's more than just creating software. You need a business model, sales pipeline, deals, contracts, accounting support.

COMMENT
How to determine if AI's a risk?

Software has experienced a baby-out-with-the-bathwater scenario. Things are bottoming, and people are sorting the wheat from the chaff.

He'd be reluctant to get involved in consumer-facing software products. They're easier to spin up quickly, compete, and buyers are less loyal. 

But commercial-grade, large company software needs security, regulatory conformity, access to other systems. When something breaks, you need someone you can call and yell at to get it fixed. So focus more on the institutional-style software names.

COMMENT
Robotics.

A big theme in the near-ish future. It'll happen sooner than people think, as AI will enable the process. Something will come out to blow people's minds and kickstart a new investment cycle.

Doesn't necessarily mean a humanoid will be doing your dishes, but perhaps a lawnmower bot or a snow shovel bot will be engaged by hitting a button on your phone.

COMMENT
Oil after Iran.

Globally, we're in a low-growth economy. Doesn't think there's an overly compelling case for sustained higher oil price outside of political-type shocks. These names aren't moving a lot on the Iran news. A higher price needs to be sustained for it to trickle down to the fundamentals of a company.

COMMENT
Gold and energy, in light of Iran events.

He's underweight gold after the recent run, but still has a pretty decent position. Gold has about a 15% weight in the index, and he certainly wouldn't be that high (more in the high single digits). 

On energy, he has about a market weight. He did a bit of selling yesterday. These events don't seem to last for long. It's been a good trade over the last 2 months.

COMMENT
Technology.

Still underweight, but looking to get back in. We had the AI scare, capex worries, and then the SaaS apocalypse. Those might be legitimate long-term worries, but investors tend to take a narrative and expand it to the end, which creates a lot of selling. 

Bigger problem for the sector right now is that it was a very crowded trade. Lots of new $$ kept flowing in, without paying that much attention to the fundamentals. Valuations exceed on the upside, and now that trade is unwinding.

The good long-term story hasn't gone away. These companies contribute to economic growth and corporate profits. He's looking to add.

Now, history teaches you things. One of the biggest mistakes he made in 2021 was buying into the pullback too early. When things were down 30-35%, his team started buying back into the names they'd sold. Then they continued to go down by 70-80%. Doesn't think that'll happen this time, as fundamentals and cashflow are better.

COMMENT
Financials.

Pulled out of financials generally. Lots of optimism around them, but he's concerned about incursions into growth from fintech and valuations are at the high end. Earnings growth not as robust going forward, plus economic sensitivity.

COMMENT
Canadian banks.

Don't have to rush out and sell, but he's not buying any of the Canadian banks -- problem is valuation. Capital markets and underwriting have been strong, loan losses haven't blown up, economy's not tanked.

Other areas of the market are more beaten up. He just can't pay these sorts of valuations. Not even great income stories anymore compared to, say, telcos and pipelines.

COMMENT

Given the Iran war, the market was looking for a reason to sell off. He was holding 20% cash, because sooner or later something would happen. Sentiment was too bullish. Also, during a US midterm year, the returns are soft in the summer. A pullback is healthy--we needed corrective action to put things back in line.

COMMENT
Iran, and energy surging today.

Most people are discounting that energy prices a year out will be significantly lower than spot prices today. No major interest rate changes today, no major shifts in currency. Gold has reacted to some extent, and bitcoin as well.

Most people are looking at the results and saying that the US has tremendous superiority in the air, and they don't want to go on the ground. Whether they can effect regime change or not is unknown. 

Constructive to note that, even with energy prices up 6% today, that's lower than they were last June with the first attack. Markets tend to adjust to geopolitical situations pretty quickly.

Most people think that this is likely a pretty short occurrence, and things should return to normal.

Showing 541 to 555 of 21,917 entries