The message, loud and clear, in recent weeks of earnings is the market is becoming more selective. Companies that delivered that earnings that would have been exceptional a year ago, are now facing pressure--strong earnings are no longer enough, but also need to justify high valuations, sustainable profitable, and a tangible return on AI. That enthusiasm about AI has shifted to seeing returns on investment and cash flows. This is healthy for the broader market, happening during surprising resilient economic growth. However, there's rising inflation above the US's 2% target. She's looking at companies' underlying cash flow and watching the bond market. Overall, the market looks constructive and you don't need to be defensive.
Based on polls, it looks like Trump will lose the House which will turn him into a lame duck president, then he will default to more executive orders. Meanwhile, central banks will keep raising interest rates. Yesterday, Google got hit, so the market is asking who will pay for AI. Overall, he's trimming and pull back, including Google after more than doubling, energy and precious metal.
For new money, telcos (as well as REITs and other sectors) have been hit as interest rates keep rising. The telcos, though, have aleady cut dividends, so they are relatively defensive. Getting more income into your portfolio now makes sense. So these sectors act like a bond proxy, which are buys.
The market expected today's Bank of Canada interest rate hike to 2.5%, given rising inflation fueled by rising energy prices from the U.S.-Iran war. It probably won't impact the TSX much because the index is heavily weighted in commodities and financials, which may actually benefit from higher rates. The hike follows the U.S. one. AI stocks are driving the market and there's a lack of market breadth. About half the S&P is tied to AI and data centres. But two-thirds of the S&P are trading below their 50-day moving average, mostly those not linked to AI, but that's where opportunities lie. He also likes energy.
The market is volatile. Everyday there is a sector or theme that works: one day AI works, the next AI isn't working, then it's energy or the hyperscalers, then not. We're all slaves to the algo trading and causes people to lose focus on long-term investing. He doesn't trade every two seconds; he focuses on the fundamentals, on quality businesses, over 3-5 years, companies that can grow EPS 10% annually and cash flow. He won't overpay for the enthusiasm for potential AI growth. He's attracted to niche US software and IT now, and the hyperscalers.
There's still room to run in global stocks in this rotation period, shifting away from U.S. tech, because investors are adding up the costs and returns in tech--and it isn't adding up. So, the shift has been to the opposite: energy, just energy thrived in the sluggish 70s. Washington: How lame duck is Trump? We'll likely see a Democrat Congress, though who knows what will happen to the Senate? Probably, we'll see gridlock, which markets like. Markets would be more bearish if things shifted entirely to the left, because of tax policy. Trump lowered corporate taxes, but there won't be tax changes for at least 6 months.
Anthropic IPO: Few surprises in today's prospectus and so far, so good. US Midterms: Historically, gridlock is good for stock markets, but what's different now is the colossal amount of US debt. Expect a shutdown in the first few months, but he hopes it won't be too disruptive. AI: Democratic states don't want new data centres in their backyard (NIMBY), which will force companies to adjust their building plans. This week, the Bank of Canada is expected to raise interest rate to keep pace with other central banks, given inflation. The world needs more housing supply and for wars to end.
Anthropic will IPO next month. Revenue growth per employee is far higher in the Mag 7 then the rest of the S&P 500, which has flatlined for the last 7 years. A chart of profit margins over that span is the same, with Mag 7 far outperforming the S&P 493. Anthropic touts AI is the most important tech to ever hit the planet given better productivity. Among the AI ETFs, AIQ is the passive way which outperforms when things are bad, but BAI outperforms when things are good. Both ETFs are the same now, and they both include SpaceX. Like SpaceX, he expects huge volatility from Anthropic, but buy the dips for a long-term hold.
It's a day-by-day thing: one day, tech rotates in, another day it rotates out. We haven't seen a full rotation though, because AI remains a dominant theme, but investors are asking when and what the returns will be, and when the capex spending will end. Who knows? Capex is massive, not since the railroads of the 1800s. He solds some Meta, Alphabet and Microsoft which he entered last spring. A lot of businesses are sitting on their hands, uncertain, like the car and steel sectors. We will feel this impact in the next few quarters.
Until very recently the market became very narrow, with only the largest of large-cap tech hanging in. As of this week, about 45% of companies in the S&P 500 are down more than 30%. With 60% down over 20%, 80% down over 10%.
The index has been looking pretty resilient, but there's a lot of weakness under the surface. Part of that has been from companies hurt by rising rates (defensive assets such as staples, utilities, etc). For companies that borrow fairly heavily, their borrowing costs have been going up.
In particular, the strength has been from companies generating lots of free cashflow and showing pretty steady dividend growth. Those have been his firm's focus.
Planning for 2026
Fed Chair Powell talked about how he thinks the US is losing jobs. Tomorrow's jobs report should be pretty interesting.
Post-FOMC last week, and post the most recent BOC meeting and Canadian employment numbers, is related to the first chart he's brought along. It shows implied current overnight rates based on how the futures market is trading. We can see that it's pricing in 2 more rate cuts (with the potential of 2.5) to the middle of 2027, but then starting to price in a bit of a tightening pattern after that.
He believes this type of thinking is completely out to lunch. Let's look at the S&P 500 analysts' top-down consensus, and there are 24 of those analysts. They think the year-end target for the S&P for 2026 is around 7489 with about 9.7% index growth. Earnings growth is estimated at 12.6%.
Those strategists are saying that the economy's going to do really well next year, earnings growth is going to be great, and we're going to have another good year for equities. But that really doesn't support what the market's pricing in terms of Fed policy. If we get that kind of earnings momentum and the S&P is strong, then we're not going to see any more rate cuts. In fact, the next series of cuts will be when the US economy starts to falter.
Equity markets and messages from bond markets are telling us different things now. We can look at the bottom-up aggregation consensus on a graph, which takes the 503 members of the S&P index and rolls up analyst targets by their weight in the index. It comes up with a target of 7938.
Historically, we've never hit those targets. So don't use them as your targets. But again, those numbers are telling you that analysts are very optimistic. Not really what the Fed funds futures are pricing in, in Larry's mind.
As we look to 2026, we have some challenges. Valuations in public equities are just not compelling right now, yet markets keep going up. He's been advocating a rebalancing of portfolios to maintain market exposure, but to shift to investment strategies that will generate more income. Private equity and private credit markets are good places to be, while still delivering on your long-term rate of return (and higher than the rate of inflation). Remember that timing the market is extremely difficult.
Next year will be challenging from an investment perspective. He's seeing a lot of things that don't add up, which tells him that something very different is likely to happen next year. He only wishes he could tell you what it will be ;)